Samsung Galaxy Note 2 vs Motorola RAZR HD XT925 Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Samsung Galaxy Note 2
Smartphone 2
Motorola RAZR HD XT925
Smartphone 3
Differences between Samsung Galaxy Note 2 and Motorola RAZR HD XT925 - Which to Choose?
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy Note 2:
- Larger battery capacity: 3100 mAh vs 2500 mAh
- Bigger screen: 5.5 inches vs 4.7 inches
- Higher RAM: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Availability of stylus: Comes with an S-Pen for added functionality
- Higher external storage support: microSD support up to 64 GB vs 32 GB
- Replaceable battery: Easier to swap out the battery if needed
Reasons to consider the Motorola RAZR HD XT925:
- Higher pixel density: 312 ppi vs 267 ppi
- More compact and lighter: Weighs 146 g vs 183 g, slimmer profile at 8.4 mm vs 9.4 mm
- Splash resistant design offering some protection against water
- Presence of HDMI port to easily connect to TVs or monitors
- Lower SAR values: Safer in terms of RF exposure
- Lower price: 250 EUR vs 300 EUR
Samsung Galaxy Note 2 or Motorola RAZR HD XT925 Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Samsung Galaxy Note 2 | Motorola RAZR HD XT925 | |
| Rating | (+0) | (+0) | |
| Release date | 2012, August | 2012, September | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 151.1 x 80.5 x 9.4 mm | 5.95 x 5.95 x 3.17 in | 131.9 x 67.9 x 8.4 mm | 5.19 x 5.19 x 2.67 in | |
| Weight | 183 g | 6.46 oz | 146 g | 5.15 oz | |
| Body Build | Plastic body | ||
| Colors | Titanium Gray, Marble White, Amber Brown, Ruby Wine, Pink, Blue | Black, White | |
| Battery | 3100 mAh, Removable Li-Ion | 2500 mAh, Non-removable Li-Po | |
| Battery life |
Stand by time - Up to 980 h (2G) / Up to 890 h (3G) Talking time - Up to 35 h (2G) / Up to 16 h (3G) |
Talking time - Up to 16 h (2G) / Up to 22 h (3G) |
|
| Approximate price | 300 EUR | 250 EUR |
Screen
| Technology | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
| Screen size | 5.5" inc | 4.7" inc | |
| Screen area | 83.4 cm2 | 60.9 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 16:9 (height:width) | 16:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 68.6% | 68.0% | |
| Screen resolution | 720 x 1280 px | 720 x 1280 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 267 PPI | 312 PPI | |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 8 MP, Single | 8 MP, Single | |
| Camera specs | -8 MP, AF, f/2.6 | -8 MP, AF | |
| Functions | LED flash | LED flash | |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps | |
| Front camera, selfie | 1.9 MP, Single | 1.3 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 1.9 MP | 1.3 MP |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 4.1.1 (Jelly Bean), upgradable to 4.4.2 (KitKat); TouchWiz UI | Android 4.0.4 (Ice Cream Sandwich), upgradable to 4.4.2 (KitKat) | |
| Chipset | - Exynos 4412 Quad (32 nm) | ||
| Processor CPU | - Quad-core 1.6 GHz Cortex-A9 | - Dual-core 1.5 GHz | |
| Graphics processor GPU | Mali-400MP4 | ||
| External memory | microSD, up to 64 GB (dedicated slot) | microSD, up to 32 GB (dedicated slot) | |
| Internal memory | 16/32/64 GB, 2 GB RAM | 16 GB (12 GB user available), 1 GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 7 Total | |||
| GeekBench 4 Single Core | 490 | ||
| GeekBench 4 Multi-Core | 1519 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Micro-SIM | Micro-SIM | |
| Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - N7105 -4G - LTE band 3(1800), 7(2600), 8(900), 20(800) - N7105 |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE band 3(1800), 7(2600), 20(800) |
|
| Speed | HSPA 42.2(LTE)/21.1(3G)/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat3 100/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat3 100/50 Mbps | |
| GPRS | Yes | Class 12 | |
| Edge | Yes | Class 12 | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, DLNA, hotspot | |
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS | Yes, with A-GPS, S-GPS, GLONASS | |
| NFC | Yes | Yes | |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 (MHL TV-out), USB Host | microUSB 2.0 | |
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP, EDR, LE | 4.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX | |
| Harmful irradiation |
SAR - 0.23 W/kg (head) 0.95 W/kg (body) SAR EU - 0.17 W/kg (head) |
SAR - 0.61 W/kg (head) 0.43 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
| Radio | Stereo FM radio, RDS - N7100 m | No | |
| Headphone jack | Yes | Yes | |
| Others | - Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic | - Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic |
Other features
| Sensors | - Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | - Accelerometer, proximity, compass | |
| Other extras |
- ANT+ -S-Voice natural language commands and dictation --Stylus |
- HDMI port -MP3/AAC+/WAV/WMA player -MP4/H.264/WMV player -Organizer -Document viewer/editor -Voice memo/dial/commands -Predictive text input - Splash resistant |
|
| Versions |
- Also known as Motorola Razr HD LTE |
Compare Samsung Galaxy Note 2 with other models:
Show More Models 📱
Reviews and Opinions on Samsung Galaxy Note 2 and Motorola RAZR HD XT925
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!
