Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A32 Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Smartphone 2
Samsung Galaxy A32
Smartphone 3
Differences between Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro and Samsung Galaxy A32 - Which to Choose?
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro:
- Higher performance chipset: Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
- Improved gaming performance with Adreno 640 GPU
- Larger battery capacity: 5160mAh
- Faster battery charging: 33W
- Higher screen refresh rate: 120Hz
- Better screen protection with Corning Gorilla Glass 6
- Better video recording capabilities: 4K@30fps
- Stereo speakers for enhanced audio experience
- Side-mounted fingerprint sensor
- Higher AnTuTu v9 benchmark score: 561112
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A32:
- Higher resolution main camera: 64 MP
- Super AMOLED display technology
- Brighter screen with up to 800 nits
- More compact and lighter design: 158.9 x 73.6 x 8.4 mm, 184g
- Dedicated microSDXC slot
- Optical in-display fingerprint sensor
- Variety of color options: Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Blue, Awesome Violet
- Lower SAR EU values
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro or Samsung Galaxy A32 Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A32 | |
| Rating | (+0) | (+0) | |
| Release date | 2021, March 22 | 2021, February 25 | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 165.3 x 76.8 x 9.4 mm | 6.51 x 6.51 x 3.02 in | 158.9 x 73.6 x 8.4 mm | 6.26 x 6.26 x 2.9 in | |
| Weight | 215 g | 7.58 oz | 184 g | 6.49 oz | |
| Body Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | |
| Colors | Phantom Black, Frost Blue, Metal Bronze | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Blue, Awesome Violet | |
| Battery | 5160 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | 5000 mAh, Li-Ion, non-removable | |
| Approximate price | $ 230 | 280 EUR |
Screen
| Technology | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
| Screen size | 6.67" inc | 6.4" inc | |
| Screen area | 107.4 cm2 | 98.9 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 20:9 (height:width) | 20:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 84.6% | 84.6% | |
| Screen resolution | 1080 x 2400 px | 1080 x 2400 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 395 PPI | 411 PPI | |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | |
| Other specs | - 120Hz -HDR10 -450 nits (typ) |
- 90Hz -800 nits |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 48 MP, Quad | 64 MP, Quad | |
| Camera specs | -48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF -8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm -2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) -2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
-64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF -8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0'', 1.12µm -5 MP, f/2.4, (macro) -5 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
|
| Functions | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR | |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps | |
| Front camera, selfie | 20 MP, Single | 20 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4'', 0.8µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | |
| Functions | HDR, panorama | ||
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 11 | Android 11, One UI 3.0 | |
| Chipset | - Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7 nm) | - Mediatek Helio G80 (12 nm) | |
| Processor CPU | - Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485 Silver) | - Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | |
| Graphics processor GPU | Adreno 640 | Mali-G52 MC2 | |
| External memory | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | |
| Internal memory | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 10 Total | 627869 | ||
| Antutu 10 CPU | 182217 | ||
| Antutu 10 GPU | 156601 | ||
| Antutu 10 Mem | 134217 | ||
| Antutu 10 UX | 182217 | ||
| Antutu 9 Total | 561112 | ||
| Antutu 8 Total | 200103 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Single Core | 969 | 415 | |
| GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 2435 | 1304 | |
| GeekBench 6 OpenCL | 2747 | 1072 | |
| GeekBench 6 Vulkan | 2441 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 738 | 342 | |
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 2413 | 1257 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Single SIM (Nano-SIM) or Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE |
|
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | |
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) | |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, USB On-The-Go | USB Type-C 2.0, USB On-The-Go | |
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE | |
| Harmful irradiation |
SAR - 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) SAR EU - 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
SAR EU - 0.45 W/kg (head) 1.30 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
| Radio | FM radio, recording | FM radio, RDS, recording | |
| Headphone jack | Yes | Yes | |
| Others | - 24-bit/192kHz audio |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass , Infrared port | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | |
| Other extras |
- Fast charging 33W, 59% in 30 min, 100% in 59 min - IP53, dust and splash protection |
- Fast charging 15W |
|
| Versions |
- Also known as Samsung Galaxy A32 4G Not to be confused with Samsung Galaxy A32 5G |
Compare Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro with other models:
Show More Models 📱
Reviews and Opinions on Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro and Samsung Galaxy A32
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!
