Samsung Galaxy On7 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy E7 Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Samsung Galaxy On7 Pro
Smartphone 2
Samsung Galaxy E7
Smartphone 3
Samsung Galaxy On7 Pro or Samsung Galaxy E7 Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
Brand and model | Samsung Galaxy On7 Pro | Samsung Galaxy E7 | |
Rating | (+) | (+) | |
Release date | 2016, July | 2015, January | |
Dimensions (HxWxD) | 152 x 78 x 8 mm | 5.98 x 5.98 x 3.07 in | 151.3 x 77.2 x 7.3 mm | 5.96 x 5.96 x 3.04 in | |
Weight | 172 g | 6.07 oz | 141 g | 4.97 oz | |
Body Build | Plastic body | Plastic body | |
Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
Colors | White, Black, Gold | Black, White, Brown, Blue | |
Battery | 3000 mAh, Removable Li-Ion | 2950 mAh, Non-removable Li-Ion | |
Battery life |
Talking time - Up to 18 h (3G) Music play - Up to 88 h |
||
Approximate price | 150 EUR | 230 EUR | |
Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
Technology | TFT | Super AMOLED | |
Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
Screen size | 5.5" in | 5.5" in | |
Screen area | 83.4 cm2 | 83.4 cm2 | |
Screen format | 16:9 (height:width) | 16:9 (height:width) | |
Screen to body ratio | 70.3% | 71.4% | |
Screen resolution | 720 x 1280 px | 720 x 1280 px | |
Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 267 PPI | 267 PPI | |
Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 4 | ||
Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
Rear camera, main | 13 MP, Single | 13 MP, Single | |
Camera specs | -13 MP, AF, f/2.1 | -13 MP, f/2.1, 27mm (wide), AF | |
Functions | LED flash | LED flash, panorama, HDR | |
Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps | |
Front camera, selfie | 5 MP, Single | 5 MP, Single | |
Specifications | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 5 MP, f/2.2, 23mm (wide) | |
Video | 1080p@30fps |
Performance
Operating system - OS | Android 6.0.1 (Marshmallow) | Android 4.4.4 (KitKat), upgradable to 5.1.1 (Lollipop) | |
Chipset | - Qualcomm MSM8916 Snapdragon 410 (28 nm) | - Qualcomm MSM8916 Snapdragon 410 (28 nm) | |
CPU | - Quad-core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A53 | - Quad-core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A53 | |
GPU | Adreno 306 | Adreno 306 | |
External memory | microSD, up to 256 GB (uses SIM 2 slot) | microSD, up to 64 GB (uses SIM 2 slot) | |
Internal memory | 16 GB, 2 GB RAM | 16 GB, 2 GB RAM |
Benchmark
Antutu 7 Total |
Communication and Connectivity
SIM card | Hybrid Dual SIM (Micro-SIM, dual stand-by) | Single SIM (Nano-SIM)Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE | |
Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - G600FY -4G - LTE - G600FY |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - E700F, E700H, E700M GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 - E7000, E700F/DS, E700H/DS, E700M/DS -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 TD-SCDMA - E7000 -4G - LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 20(800) - E700F LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 7(2600), 38(2600), 39(1900), 40(2300), 41(2500) - E7000 |
|
Speed | HSPA, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | |
GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
Edge | Yes | Yes | |
Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | |
GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS/ BDS (region dependent) | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS | |
NFC | Yes (LTE model) | ||
USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 | |
Bluetooth | 4.1, A2DP | 4.0, A2DP | |
Harmful irradiation |
SAR - 0.79 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) SAR EU - 0.38 W/kg (head) 0.54 W/kg (body) |
SAR - 0.64 W/kg (head) 0.85 W/kg (body) SAR EU - 0.33 W/kg (head) 0.47 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
Radio | FM radio | FM radio, RDS, recording | |
Headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
Other features
Sensors | - Accelerometer, proximity | - Accelerometer, proximity | |
Other extras |
- ANT+ |
||
Versions |
- Versions: E7000, E7009, E700F, E700F/DS, E700H, E700H/DD, E700H/DS, E700M, E700M/DS Also known as Samsung Galaxy E7 Duos with dual-SIM card slots |
Reviews and Opinions on Samsung Galaxy On7 Pro and Samsung Galaxy E7
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!