Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro vs Samsung Gravity SMART Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro
Smartphone 2
Samsung Gravity SMART
Smartphone 3
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro or Samsung Gravity SMART Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
Brand and model | Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro | Samsung Gravity SMART | |
Rating | (+) | (+) | |
Release date | 2016, October | 2011, June | |
Dimensions (HxWxD) | 162.9 x 80.7 x 6.9 mm | 6.41 x 6.41 x 3.18 in | 114 x 59 x 14 mm | 4.49 x 4.49 x 2.32 in | |
Weight | 189 g | 6.67 oz | 130 g | 4.59 oz | |
Body Build | Front glass, aluminum body | ||
Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
Colors | Gold, Pink Gold, Black | Black/Red, Black/Green, Lunar Grey | |
Battery | 4000 mAh, Non-removable | 1500 mAh, Removable Li-Ion | |
Battery life |
Stand by time - Up to 364 h Talking time - Up to 5 h 30 min |
||
Keyboard | QWERTY | ||
Approximate price | 430 EUR | 170 EUR | |
Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
Technology | Super AMOLED | TFT | |
Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
Screen size | 6" in | 3.2" in | |
Screen area | 99.2 cm2 | 30.5 cm2 | |
Screen format | 16:9 (height:width) | 3:2 (height:width) | |
Screen to body ratio | 75.5% | 45.3% | |
Screen resolution | 1080 x 1920 px | 320 x 480 px | |
Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 367 PPI | 180 PPI | |
Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass (unspecified version) | ||
Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
Rear camera, main | 16 MP, Single | 3.15 MP, Single | |
Camera specs | -16 MP, PDAF, f/1.9 | -3.15 MP | |
Functions | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash | |
Video | 1080p@30fps | 320p@14fps | |
Front camera, selfie | 16 MP, Single | 0 MP, | |
Specifications | 16 MP, f/1.9 | ||
Video | 1080p@30fps |
Performance
Operating system - OS | Android 6.0.1 (Marshmallow), upgradable to Android 8.0 (Oreo) | Android 2.2 (Froyo) | |
Chipset | - Qualcomm MSM8976 Pro Snapdragon 653 (28 nm) | ||
CPU | - Octa-core (4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A72 & 4x1.4 GHz Cortex-A53) | - 800 MHz ARMv6 | |
GPU | Adreno 510 | ||
External memory | microSD, up to 256 GB (dedicated slot) | microSD, up to 32 GB (dedicated slot), 2 GB included | |
Internal memory | 64 GB, 6 GB RAM | 150 MB, 270 MB RAM |
Benchmark
GeekBench 6 Single Core | 224 | ||
GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 806 | ||
GeekBench 5 Single Core | 215 | ||
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 953 | ||
GeekBench 4 Single Core | 1294 | ||
GeekBench 4 Multi-Core | 4035 | ||
GeekBench 4 RenderScript | 4099 |
Communication and Connectivity
SIM card | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Mini-SIM | |
Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA | |
Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 40(2300), 41(2500) - India |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
|
Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps | HSPA 3.6/0.384 Mbps | |
GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
Edge | Yes | Yes | |
Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, WiFi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g, DLNA, hotspot | |
GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS/ BDS (region dependent) | Yes, with A-GPS | |
NFC | Yes | ||
USB | Type-C 1.0 reversible connector | microUSB 2.0 | |
Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 3.0, A2DP | |
Harmful irradiation |
SAR EU - 0.79 W/kg (head) 1.62 W/kg (body) |
SAR - 0.47 W/kg (head) 1.05 W/kg (body) SAR EU - 0.19 W/kg (head) |
Music and Audio
Radio | Stereo FM radio with RDS | No | |
Headphone jack | Yes | Yes | |
Others | - Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic |
Other features
Sensors | - Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | - Accelerometer, proximity | |
Other extras |
- ANT+ - Fast battery charging - |
- MP4/H.264 player -MP3/WAV/AAC+ player -Organizer -Photo/video editor -Document viewer -Voice memo -Predictive text input (Swype) |
|
Versions |
- For T-Mobile. Also known as Samsung Gravity Touch 2, Samsung Smart, Samsung GT2, Samsung SGH-T589, Samsung Galaxy Q |
Reviews and Opinions on Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro and Samsung Gravity SMART
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!