Xiaomi Redmi 9C vs ZTE Blade A72 4G compare
Smartphone 1
Remove
Xiaomi Redmi 9C
Smartphone 2
Remove
ZTE Blade A72 4G
Smartphone 3
Xiaomi Redmi 9C vs ZTE Blade A72 4G
What is the difference between the Xiaomi Redmi 9C and ZTE Blade A72 4G? Which one is better? The answers to these questions and many more can be found here in this detailed comparison of the two phones. Discover the differences in specs between these two desirable devices, from screen size to battery life, in the table below. We have all the information you need to choose the best phone for you.
Common specs
| Brand and model | Xiaomi Redmi 9C | ZTE Blade A72 4G | |
| Rating | (+) | (+) | |
| Review | Xiaomi Redmi 9C Review | ||
| Release date | 2020, June 30 | 2022, June 10 | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 164.9 x 77 x 9 mm | 6.49 x 6.49 x 3.03 in | 168 x 77.5 x 9.4 mm | 6.61 x 6.61 x 3.05 in | |
| Weight | 196 g | 6.91 oz | 214 g | 7.55 oz | |
| Colors | Midnight Gray, Sunrise Orange, Twilight Blue | Space Gray, Sky Blue | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh, Non-removable Li-Po | 6000 mAh, Li-Ion, non-removable | |
| Approximate price | 150 EUR | 110 EUR |
Screen
| Technology | IPS LCD | IPS LCD | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
| Screen size | 6.53" inc | 6.75" inc | |
| Screen area | 102.9 cm2 | 110.0 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 20:9 (height:width) | 20:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 81.1% | 84.5% | |
| Screen resolution | 720 x 1600 px | 1080 x 2400 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 269 PPI | 390 PPI | |
| Other specs | - 400 nits typ. brightness | - 90Hz |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 13 MP, Triple | 13 MP, Triple | |
| Camera specs | -13 MP, f/2.2, 28mm (wide), 1.0µm, PDAF -2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) -2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
-13 MP, AF -2 MP (macro) -2 MP (depth) |
|
| Functions | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR | |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps | |
| Front camera, selfie | 5 MP, Single | 5 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.12µm | 5 MP | |
| Functions | HDR | ||
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 10, MIUI 12 | Android 11, MiFavor 11 | |
| Chipset | - MediaTek Helio G35 (12 nm) | - Unisoc SC9863A (28nm) | |
| Processor CPU | - Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | - Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) | |
| Graphics processor GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | IMG8322 | |
| External memory | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC | |
| Internal memory | 32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM | 64GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 3GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 9 Total | 115768 | ||
| Antutu 8 Total | 110239 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 138 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 532 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE | |
Show all network frequencies: |
|||
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A | HSPA, LTE | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Yes | |
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS | |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | No | |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, USB On-The-Go | USB Type-C 2.0, USB On-The-Go | |
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | Yes | |
| Harmful irradiation |
SAR - 0.73 W/kg (head) 0.52 W/kg (body) SAR EU - 0.35 W/kg (head) 0.78 W/kg (body) |
||
Music and Audio
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio | |
| Headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity , Infrared port | - Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | |
| Other extras |
- 10W |
- Fast charging 22.5W |
Share on Share on
