Xiaomi Redmi 10C vs ZTE Blade V40 Smart compare
Smartphone 1
Remove
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Smartphone 2
Remove
ZTE Blade V40 Smart
Smartphone 3
Xiaomi Redmi 10C vs ZTE Blade V40 Smart
What is the difference between the Xiaomi Redmi 10C and ZTE Blade V40 Smart? Which one is better? The answers to these questions and many more can be found here in this detailed comparison of the two phones. Discover the differences in specs between these two desirable devices, from screen size to battery life, in the table below. We have all the information you need to choose the best phone for you.
Common specs
| Brand and model | Xiaomi Redmi 10C | ZTE Blade V40 Smart | |
| Rating | (+) | (+) | |
| Review | Xiaomi Redmi 10C Review | ||
| Release date | 2022, March 21 | March, 2022 | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 169.6 x 76.6 x 8.3 mm | 6.68 x 6.68 x 3.02 in | 168.0 x 77.5 x 9.4 mm | 6.61 x 6.61 x 3.05 in | |
| Weight | 190 g | 6.7 oz | 215 g | 7.58 oz | |
| Body Build | Plastic | Plastic | |
| Colors | Graphite Gray, Ocean Blue, Mint Green | Black, Red, Cyan | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | 6000 mAh, Li-Polymer, non-removable | |
| Approximate price | $ 190 |
Screen
| Technology | IPS LCD | LCD IPS | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
| Screen size | 6.71" inc | 6.74" inc | |
| Screen area | 106.5 cm2 | ||
| Screen format | 20:9 (height:width) | 20:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 82.0% | 84% | |
| Screen resolution | 720 x 1650 px | 720 x 1600 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 268 PPI | 260 PPI | |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Scratch resistant | |
| Other specs | - 90 Hz |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 50 MP, Dual | 13 MP, Triple | |
| Camera specs | -50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF -2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
-13 MP, ƒ/ 1.8, (wide), 0.80 µm -2 MP, ƒ/ 2.4, (depth), -2 MP, (macro) |
|
| Functions | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash | |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p video | |
| Front camera, selfie | 5 MP, Single | 5 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 5 MP, ƒ/ 2.0 | |
| Video | 1080p@30fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 11, MIUI 13 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| Chipset | - Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | - Unisoc Tiger T606 (12 nm) | |
| Processor CPU | - Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | - Octa-Core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex A75 + 6x1.6 GHz Cortex A55) | |
| Graphics processor GPU | Adreno 610 | ARM Mali-G57 | |
| External memory | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | ||
| Internal memory | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 3GB 64GB, 3GB · 64GB |
Benchmark
| Antutu 10 Total | 307771 | ||
| Antutu 10 CPU | 108048 | ||
| Antutu 10 GPU | 39387 | ||
| Antutu 10 Mem | 91380 | ||
| Antutu 10 UX | 108048 | ||
| Antutu 9 Total | 248641 | 214006 | |
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 292 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 1328 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | , Single SIM (Nano SIM) | |
| Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE | 2G / 3G / 4G / | |
Show all network frequencies: |
|||
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A | ||
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | 802.11b, 802.11g, 802.11n,Wi-Fi Hotspot ,Wi-Fi Direct | |
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, A-GPS | |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | No | |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, USB On-The-Go | Yes, USB On-The-Go (OTG) | |
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | Bluetooth 5.0, A2DP, LE | |
| Harmful irradiation |
SAR - 0.96 W/kg (head) 1.02 W/kg (body) SAR EU - 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
||
Music and Audio
| Radio | FM radio | Yes | |
| Headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | - Fingerprint (side-mounted), Proximity, Accelerometer, compass, gyro , Infrared port | |
| Other extras |
- Fast charging 18W |
- Fast charging 22.5W |
Share on Share on
