Motorola Moto E32 vs Motorola Moto G53 compare
The best smartphone comparison tool: compare Motorola Moto E32 vs Motorola Moto G53 and choose the best model for you
Smartphone 1
Remove
Motorola Moto E32
Smartphone 2
Remove
Motorola Moto G53
Smartphone 3
Motorola Moto E32 vs Motorola Moto G53
What is the difference between the Motorola Moto E32 and Motorola Moto G53? Which one is better? The answers to these questions and many more can be found here in this detailed comparison of the two phones. Discover the differences in specs between these two desirable devices, from screen size to battery life, in the table below. We have all the information you need to choose the best phone for you.
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Motorola Moto E32 | Motorola Moto G53 | |
| Rating | (+) | (+) | |
| Review | |||
| Release date | 2022, May 05 | December, 2022 | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 164 x 75 x 8.5 mm | 6.46 x 6.46 x 2.95 in | 162.7 x 74.7 x 8.2 mm | 6.41 x 6.41 x 2.94 in | |
| Weight | 184 g | 6.49 oz | 183 g | 6.46 oz | |
| Body Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | |
| Colors | Misty Silver, Pearl Blue, Slate Grey | Ink Blue, Arctic Silver, Pale Pink | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | 5000 mAh, Li-Ion, non-removable | |
| Approximate price | 150 EUR | 250 EUR |
Screen
| Technology | IPS LCD | LCD IPS | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
| Screen size | 6.5" inc | 6.52" inc | |
| Screen area | 103.5 cm2 | ||
| Screen format | 20:9 (height:width) | 20:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 84.2% | 84% | |
| Screen resolution | 720 x 1600 px | 720 x 1600 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 268 PPI | 269 PPI | |
| Screen protection | Scratch resistant | ||
| Other specs | - 90Hz | - 120 Hz -Touch 240 Hz |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 16 MP, Triple | 50 MP, Dual | |
| Camera specs | -16 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1.0µm, PDAF -2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) -2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
-50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF -2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
|
| Functions | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash | |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p video, Slow Motion 120 fps | |
| Front camera, selfie | 8 MP, Single | 8 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4", 1.12µm | |
| Functions | HDR | ||
| Video | 1080p@30fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 11 | Android 13 | |
| Chipset | - Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | - Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) | |
| Processor CPU | - Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | - Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | |
| Graphics processor GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 619 | |
| External memory | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | |
| Internal memory | 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 9 Total | 155239 | 319949 | |
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 313 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 1175 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Single SIM (Nano-SIM)Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Single SIM (Nano-SIM) or Hybrid SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE | 2G / 3G / 4G / 5G | |
Show all network frequencies: |
|||
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE | ||
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | |
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | |
| NFC | No | No | |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | Yes, USB Type C, USB On-The-Go (OTG) | |
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE | |
Music and Audio
| Radio | FM radio | ||
| Headphone jack | Yes | Yes | |
| Others |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | - Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass , Infrared port | |
| Other extras |
- Fast charge 18W - Water repellent design |
- Fast charging 10W -Reverse wired - Water-resistant design |
Share on Share on