Samsung Galaxy A34 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A53 5G Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Smartphone 2
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
Smartphone 3
Differences between Samsung Galaxy A34 5G and Samsung Galaxy A53 5G - Which to Choose?
Reasons to Consider the Samsung Galaxy A34 5G:
- Processor and Performance: The Galaxy A34 5G is equipped with the Mediatek MT6877V Dimensity 1080 chipset, which might offer slightly better performance in certain tasks compared to the Exynos 1280 of the A53 5G.
- Antutu Score: It has a higher Antutu benchmark score (473852), indicating potentially better overall performance.
- Camera Options: The A34 features a triple camera setup with a 48 MP primary sensor, which might offer competitive photographic capabilities.
- Newer Model: Being released in 2023, it may have some updated features and optimizations over the A53 5G, which was released in 2022.
- Battery: Both phones have a 5000 mAh battery, but the A34 5G's newer technology might offer better optimization and battery management.
Reasons to Consider Samsung Galaxy A53 5G:
- Camera Quality: The A53 5G boasts a higher resolution main camera (64 MP) and a quad-camera setup, potentially offering better photo quality and versatility.
- Selfie Camera: It has a superior 32 MP front camera compared to the 13 MP on the A34 5G, which might be preferable for selfie enthusiasts.
- Screen Quality: While both have Super AMOLED displays, the A53 5G has a slightly higher PPI (405 vs. 390), which could translate to a crisper display.
- Lighter Weight: The A53 5G is slightly lighter (189g vs. 199g), which might be more comfortable for prolonged use.
- Geekbench Score: The Galaxy A53 5G has a higher Geekbench multi-core score (1911), indicating potentially better multi-tasking performance.
Conclusion:
Performance: The A34 5G might have a slight edge in performance due to its newer chipset and higher Antutu score.
Camera: The A53 5G takes the lead in camera capabilities, with a higher resolution main and selfie camera.
Display and Design: The A53 5G also has a slight advantage in screen quality and is lighter in weight.
Latest Technology: The A34 5G being a newer model, might have some updated features and better optimization.
Your choice between these two smartphones should depend on what aspects are more important to you - whether it's camera quality, performance, or the latest features. Both phones are strong contenders in their own right.
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G or Samsung Galaxy A53 5G Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Samsung Galaxy A34 5G | Samsung Galaxy A53 5G | |
| Rating | (+5) | (+2) | |
| Release date | 2023, March 14 | 2022, March 17 | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2 mm | 6.35 x 6.35 x 3.07 in | 159.6 x 74.8 x 8.1 mm | 6.28 x 6.28 x 2.94 in | |
| Weight | 199 g | 7.02 oz | 189 g | 6.67 oz | |
| Body Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back | |
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Lime, Graphite, Violet, Silver | Black, White, Blue, Peach | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | 5000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | |
| Approximate price | 389 EUR | $ 320 | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
| Screen size | 6.6" in | 6.5" in | |
| Screen area | 106.9 cm2 | 102.0 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 19.5:9 (height:width) | 20:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 84.9% | 85.4% | |
| Screen resolution | 1080 x 2340 px | 1080 x 2400 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 390 PPI | 405 PPI | |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | |
| Other specs | - 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | - 120Hz -800 nits (HBM) |
|
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 48 MP, Triple | 64 MP, Quad | |
| Camera specs | -48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0'', 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS -8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0'', 1.12µm -5 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
-64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7X", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS -12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm -5 MP, f/2.4, (macro) -5 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
|
| Functions | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR | |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS | |
| DxOMark Main Score | 92 | 105 | |
| DxOMark Photo | 99 | 111 | |
| DxOMark Video | 78 | 93 | |
| Front camera, selfie | 13 MP, Single | 32 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1'', 1.12µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8'', 0.8µm | |
| Functions | HDR | ||
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 13, One UI 5.1 | Android 12, One UI 4.1 | |
| Chipset | - Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) | - Exynos 1280 (5 nm) | |
| CPU | - Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | - Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G68 | |
| External memory | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | |
| Internal memory | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 10 Total | 556613 | 442531 | |
| Antutu 10 CPU | 172806 | 137367 | |
| Antutu 10 GPU | 116205 | 104515 | |
| Antutu 10 Mem | 115870 | 83420 | |
| Antutu 10 UX | 172806 | 137367 | |
| Antutu 9 Total | 473852 | 414785 | |
| GeekBench 6 Single Core | 853 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 1911 | ||
| GeekBench 6 OpenCL | 2294 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Vulkan | 2302 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 780 | 691 | |
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 2341 | 1789 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Single SIM (Nano-SIM)Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Single SIM (Nano-SIM) or Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE -5G - SA/NSA/Sub6 |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66 - SM-A536U 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 20, 28, 46, 48, 66 - SM-A536V -5G - 2, 5, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536U 2, 5, 48, 66, 77, 78, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536V |
|
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A, 5G | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) | |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, USB On-The-Go | |
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE | |
| Harmful irradiation |
SAR EU - 0.55 W/kg (head) 1.49 W/kg (body) |
SAR - 0.75 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body) SAR EU - 0.89 W/kg (head) 1.60 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
| Radio | No | No | |
| Headphone jack | No | No | |
| Others |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity | |
| Other extras |
- Fast charging 25W - IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 mins) |
- Fast charging 25W - IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 mins) |
Reviews and Opinions on Samsung Galaxy A34 5G and Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!
