Oppo Reno10 vs Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Oppo Reno10
Smartphone 2
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Smartphone 3
Differences between Oppo Reno10 and Samsung Galaxy A54 5G - Which to Choose?
Reasons to consider the Oppo Reno10:
- Processor and GPU: The Oppo Reno10 is equipped with the Mediatek Dimensity 7050 chipset and a Mali-G68 MC4 GPU. This setup might offer slightly better performance in certain tasks and applications compared to the Exynos 1380 and Mali-G68 MP5 in the Samsung Galaxy A54 5G.
- Antutu Benchmark Score: The Oppo Reno10 has a higher Antutu benchmark score (525479) compared to the Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (512020). This suggests the Reno10 may have better overall performance.
- Charging Speed: The Reno10 supports fast charging at 67W, which is significantly faster than the 25W charging of the A54 5G. This means quicker battery top-ups.
- Display Quality: The Oppo Reno10 features a slightly larger screen (6.7 inches) with higher peak brightness (950 nits) than the A54 5G. This could translate to a more immersive and better viewing experience, especially outdoors.
- Camera Setup: The Reno10's camera configuration, especially the 64 MP main sensor, could offer better imaging capabilities compared to the 50 MP main sensor of the A54 5G.
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A54 5G:
- Build Quality: The A54 5G features Corning Gorilla Glass 5 for both front and back, which might offer better durability compared to the glass front and plastic frame of the Reno10.
- Water Resistance: It has IP67 dust/water resistance (up to 1m for 30 mins), a feature not mentioned for the Reno10.
- Screen Protection: The use of Gorilla Glass 5 for screen protection could provide better resistance to scratches and minor impacts.
- Weight: The Galaxy A54 5G is slightly heavier (202g vs 185g), which some users might associate with a more solid build quality.
- Sensor Package: The inclusion of a barometer in the A54 5G (in the USA) adds an extra feature for environment tracking.
Common Features:
Both have similar battery capacities (5000 mAh).
Both run on Android 13 and have similar memory configurations.
Both support 5G, indicating future-proof connectivity.
Summary:
Choose the Oppo Reno10 for better performance, faster charging, and possibly superior camera capabilities.
Opt for the Samsung Galaxy A54 5G for better build quality, water resistance, and additional sensor features.
These reasons are based on the specifications you provided. The actual user experience may vary based on software optimization, real-world usage, and personal preferences.
Oppo Reno10 or Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Oppo Reno10 | Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | |
| Rating | (+0) | (+0) | |
| Release date | 2023, July 08 | 2023, March 14 | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 162.4 x 74.2 x 8 mm | 6.39 x 6.39 x 2.92 in | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm | 6.23 x 6.23 x 3.02 in | |
| Weight | 185 g | 6.53 oz | 202 g | 7.13 oz | |
| Body Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame | |
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Silvery Grey, Ice Blue | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | 5000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | |
| Approximate price | 350 EUR | 400 EUR | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | AMOLED | Super AMOLED | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 1B | 16M | |
| Screen size | 6.7" in | 6.4" in | |
| Screen area | 108.0 cm2 | 100.5 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 20:9 (height:width) | 19.5:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 89.6% | 82.9% | |
| Screen resolution | 1080 x 2412 px | 1080 x 2340 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 394 PPI | 403 PPI | |
| Screen protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | |
| Other specs | - 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | - 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) | |
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 64 MP, Triple | 50 MP, Triple | |
| Camera specs | -64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2'', 0.7µm, PDAF -32 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.74'', 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom -8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0'', 1.12µm |
-50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS -12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm -5 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
|
| Functions | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR | |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps | |
| DxOMark Main Score | 104 | ||
| DxOMark Photo | 106 | ||
| DxOMark Video | 115 | ||
| Front camera, selfie | 32 MP, Single | 32 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74'', 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8'', 0.8µm | |
| Functions | Panorama, HDR | HDR | |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 13, One UI 5.1 | |
| Chipset | - Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | - Exynos 1380 (5 nm) | |
| CPU | - Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | - Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G68 MP5 | |
| External memory | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | |
| Internal memory | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 10 Total | 590616 | ||
| Antutu 10 CPU | 191351 | ||
| Antutu 10 GPU | 136765 | ||
| Antutu 10 Mem | 112999 | ||
| Antutu 10 UX | 191351 | ||
| Antutu 9 Total | 525479 | 512020 | |
| GeekBench 6 Single Core | 977 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 2760 | ||
| GeekBench 6 OpenCL | 3007 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Vulkan | 3015 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 866 | 777 | |
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 2801 | 2600 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Single SIM (Nano-SIM, eSIM) or Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 -3G - HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International HSDPA 900 / 2100 - Version 2/3 -4G - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International -5G - 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE -5G - SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave |
|
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) | |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | |
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE | |
| Harmful irradiation |
SAR - 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) SAR EU - 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
| Radio | No | No | |
| Headphone jack | No | No | |
| Others | - 24-bit/192kHz audio |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass , Infrared port | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) | |
| Other extras |
- Fast charging 67W -PD3 -Reverse charging |
- Fast charging 25W - IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 mins) |
Reviews and Opinions on Oppo Reno10 and Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!