Cubot X70 vs Samsung Galaxy A55 compare
Smartphone 2
Remove
Samsung Galaxy A55
Smartphone 3
Cubot X70 vs Samsung Galaxy A55
What is the difference between the Cubot X70 and Samsung Galaxy A55? Which one is better? The answers to these questions and many more can be found here in this detailed comparison of the two phones. Discover the differences in specs between these two desirable devices, from screen size to battery life, in the table below. We have all the information you need to choose the best phone for you.
Common specs
| Brand and model | Cubot X70 | Samsung Galaxy A55 | |
| Rating | (+) | (+) | |
| Review | |||
| Release date | May, 2023 | 2024, March 11 | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 165.1 x 75.3 x 10.2 mm | 6.5 x 6.5 x 2.96 in | 161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2 mm | 6.34 x 6.34 x 3.05 in | |
| Weight | 220 g | 7.76 oz | 213 g | 7.51 oz | |
| Body Build | Metal | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass), aluminum frame | |
| Colors | Tech Black, Space Black | Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | 5000 mAh, Li-Ion | |
| Body Form | Samsung | ||
| Approximate price | € 279.9 |
Screen
| Technology | LCD IPS | Super AMOLED | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
| Screen size | 6.58" inc | 6.6" inc | |
| Screen area | 104.3 cm2 | 106.9 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 20:9 (height:width) | 19.5:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 83.9% | 85.8% | |
| Screen resolution | 1080 x 2408 px | 1080 x 2340 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 401 PPI | 390 PPI | |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | ||
| Other specs | - 120Hz -Secondary screen on the back |
- 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) - |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 100 MP, Triple | 50 MP, Triple | |
| Camera specs | -100 MP, (wide), PDAF -5 MP, (macro) -VGA |
-50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS -12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm -5 MP (macro) |
|
| Functions | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR | |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | |
| Front camera, selfie | 32 MP, Single | 32 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 32 MP | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 13 Tiramisu | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 | |
| Chipset | - MediaTek Helio G99 (MT6789) (6 nm) | - Exynos 1480 (4 nm) | |
| Processor CPU | - Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | - Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | |
| Graphics processor GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Xclipse 530 | |
| External memory | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | |
| Internal memory | 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 9 Total | 340001 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | · Nano-SIM · Nano-SIM + eSIM · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
|
| Network | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | |
Show all network frequencies: |
|||
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) | |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | |
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP | 5.3, A2DP, LE | |
| Harmful irradiation |
SAR EU - 0.68 W/kg (head) 1.04 W/kg (body) |
||
Music and Audio
| Radio | No | ||
| Headphone jack | No | No | |
| Others |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity | |
| Other extras |
- Fast charging 18.0W |
- 25W Fast charging - IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
Share on Share on
