LG K92 5G vs Motorola Moto G51 5G compare
The best smartphone comparison tool: compare LG K92 5G vs Motorola Moto G51 5G and choose the best model for you
Smartphone 2
Remove
Motorola Moto G51 5G
Smartphone 3
LG K92 5G vs Motorola Moto G51 5G
What is the difference between the LG K92 5G and Motorola Moto G51 5G? Which one is better? The answers to these questions and many more can be found here in this detailed comparison of the two phones. Discover the differences in specs between these two desirable devices, from screen size to battery life, in the table below. We have all the information you need to choose the best phone for you.
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | LG K92 5G | Motorola Moto G51 5G | |
| Rating | (+) | (+) | |
| Review | Motorola Moto G51 5G Review | ||
| Release date | 2020, September 29 | 2021, November 03 | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 166.4 x 77.2 x 8.4 mm | 6.55 x 6.55 x 3.04 in | 170.5 x 76.5 x 9.1 mm | 6.71 x 6.71 x 3.01 in | |
| Weight | 202.4 g | 7.14 oz | 208 g | 7.34 oz | |
| Colors | Titan Gray | Indigo Blue, Bright Silver, Aqua Blue | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | 5000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | |
| Approximate price | 340 EUR | 230 EUR |
Screen
| Technology | IPS LCD | IPS LCD | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
| Screen size | 6.7" inc | 6.8" inc | |
| Screen area | 108.4 cm2 | 111.6 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 20:9 (height:width) | 20:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 84.4% | 85.6% | |
| Screen resolution | 1080 x 2400 px | 1080 x 2400 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 393 PPI | 387 PPI | |
| Other specs | - 120Hz |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 64 MP, Quad | 50 MP, Triple | |
| Camera specs | -64 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/1.97'', 0.7µm, PDAF -5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0'', 1.12µm -2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) -2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
-50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76'', 0.64µm, PDAF -8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0'', 1.12µm -2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
|
| Functions | Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama | |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60/240fps | |
| Front camera, selfie | 16 MP, Single | 13 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 16 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide), 1/3.06, 1.0µm | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.12µm | |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 10 | Android 11 | |
| Chipset | - Qualcomm SM6350 Snapdragon 690 5G (8 nm) | - Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) | |
| Processor CPU | - Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 560 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 560 Silver) | - Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | |
| Graphics processor GPU | Adreno 619L | Adreno 619 | |
| External memory | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | |
| Internal memory | 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 9 Total | 381659 | ||
| Antutu 8 Total | 275378 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 544 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 1698 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | |
Show all network frequencies: |
|||
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A (CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | |
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) | |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 | |
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD/Adaptive | |
Music and Audio
| Radio | No | FM radio | |
| Headphone jack | Yes | Yes | |
| Others |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | - Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | |
| Other extras |
- Quick Charge 4.0 |
- Charging 10W - Water-repellent design |
Share on Share on