LG K92 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A32 5G compare
Smartphone 2
Remove
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Smartphone 3
LG K92 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
What is the difference between the LG K92 5G and Samsung Galaxy A32 5G? Which one is better? The answers to these questions and many more can be found here in this detailed comparison of the two phones. Discover the differences in specs between these two desirable devices, from screen size to battery life, in the table below. We have all the information you need to choose the best phone for you.
Common specs
| Brand and model | LG K92 5G | Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | |
| Rating | (+) | (+) | |
| Review | Samsung Galaxy A32 5G Review | ||
| Release date | 2020, September 29 | 2021, January 13 | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 166.4 x 77.2 x 8.4 mm | 6.55 x 6.55 x 3.04 in | 164.2 x 76.1 x 9.1 mm | 6.46 x 6.46 x 3 in | |
| Weight | 202.4 g | 7.14 oz | 205 g | 7.23 oz | |
| Colors | Titan Gray | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Blue, Awesome Violet | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | 5000 mAh, Li-Ion, non-removable | |
| Approximate price | 340 EUR | 250 EUR |
Screen
| Technology | IPS LCD | TFT | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
| Screen size | 6.7" inc | 6.5" inc | |
| Screen area | 108.4 cm2 | 102.0 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 20:9 (height:width) | 20:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 84.4% | 81.6% | |
| Screen resolution | 1080 x 2400 px | 720 x 1600 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 393 PPI | 270 PPI |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 64 MP, Quad | 48 MP, Quad | |
| Camera specs | -64 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/1.97'', 0.7µm, PDAF -5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0'', 1.12µm -2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) -2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
-48 MP, f/1.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0'', 0.8µm, PDAF -8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0'', 1.12µm -5 MP, f/2.4, (macro) -2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
|
| Functions | Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR | |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps | |
| Front camera, selfie | 16 MP, Single | 13 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 16 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide), 1/3.06, 1.0µm | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 10 | Android 11, One UI 3.0 | |
| Chipset | - Qualcomm SM6350 Snapdragon 690 5G (8 nm) | - MediaTek MT6853 Dimensity 720 5G (7 nm) | |
| Processor CPU | - Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 560 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 560 Silver) | - Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | |
| Graphics processor GPU | Adreno 619L | Mali-G57 MC3 | |
| External memory | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | |
| Internal memory | 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 8 Total | 275378 | 249521 | |
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 555 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 1666 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Single SIM (Nano-SIM) or Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | |
Show all network frequencies: |
|||
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A, 5G | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | |
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) | |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0, USB On-The-Go | |
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE | |
| Harmful irradiation |
SAR EU - 0.33 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
||
Music and Audio
| Radio | No | ||
| Headphone jack | Yes | Yes | |
| Others |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | - Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | |
| Other extras |
- Quick Charge 4.0 |
- Fast charging 15W |
Share on Share on
