Motorola Moto G52 vs Umidigi Bison 2 Pro compare
The best smartphone comparison tool: compare Motorola Moto G52 vs Umidigi Bison 2 Pro and choose the best model for you
Smartphone 1
Remove
Motorola Moto G52
Smartphone 2
Remove
Umidigi Bison 2 Pro
Smartphone 3
Motorola Moto G52 vs Umidigi Bison 2 Pro
What is the difference between the Motorola Moto G52 and Umidigi Bison 2 Pro? Which one is better? The answers to these questions and many more can be found here in this detailed comparison of the two phones. Discover the differences in specs between these two desirable devices, from screen size to battery life, in the table below. We have all the information you need to choose the best phone for you.
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Motorola Moto G52 | Umidigi Bison 2 Pro | |
| Rating | (+) | (+) | |
| Review | |||
| Release date | 2022, April | 2022 | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 160.1 x 74.5 x 8 mm | 6.3 x 6.3 x 2.93 in | 172.1 x 83.8 x 12.9 mm | 6.78 x 6.78 x 3.3 in | |
| Weight | 169 g | 5.96 oz | 280 g | 9.88 oz | |
| Colors | Charcoal Gray, Porcelain White | Black | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | 6150 mAh, , non-removable | |
| Approximate price | 250 EUR |
Screen
| Technology | AMOLED | ||
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
| Screen size | 6.6" inc | 6.5" inc | |
| Screen area | 103.6 cm2 | 102.0 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 20:9 (height:width) | 20:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 86.9% | 70.7% | |
| Screen resolution | 1080 x 2400 px | 1080 x 2400 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 402 PPI | 405 PPI | |
| Other specs | - 90Hz | - - |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 50 MP, Triple | 48 MP, Triple | |
| Camera specs | -50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76'', 0.64µm, PDAF -8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0'', 1.12µm -2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
-48 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF -16 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) -5 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
|
| Functions | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR | |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps | |
| Front camera, selfie | 16 MP, Single | 24 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1.0µm | 24 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 12 | Android 12 | |
| Chipset | - Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | - Mediatek Helio P90 (12 nm) | |
| Processor CPU | - Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | - Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | |
| Graphics processor GPU | Adreno 610 | PowerVR GM9446 | |
| External memory | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | |
| Internal memory | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 9 Total | 216545 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 369 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 1511 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | |
Show all network frequencies: |
|||
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A | HSPA, LTE | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | |
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes | |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C, OTG | |
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE | |
Music and Audio
| Radio | Wireless FM radio | ||
| Headphone jack | Yes | Yes | |
| Others |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | - Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer (skin temperature) | |
| Other extras |
- Fast charging 30W - Water-repellent design |
- 18W Fast charging - IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) -MIL-STD-810G compliant |
Share on Share on