Oppo Reno6 Lite vs Motorola Moto E32 compare
The best smartphone comparison tool: compare Oppo Reno6 Lite vs Motorola Moto E32 and choose the best model for you
Smartphone 1
Remove
Oppo Reno6 Lite
Smartphone 2
Remove
Motorola Moto E32
Smartphone 3
Oppo Reno6 Lite vs Motorola Moto E32
What is the difference between the Oppo Reno6 Lite and Motorola Moto E32? Which one is better? The answers to these questions and many more can be found here in this detailed comparison of the two phones. Discover the differences in specs between these two desirable devices, from screen size to battery life, in the table below. We have all the information you need to choose the best phone for you.
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Oppo Reno6 Lite | Motorola Moto E32 | |
| Rating | (+0) | (+0) | |
| Review | |||
| Release date | 2022, January 17 | 2022, May 05 | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 160.3 x 73.8 x 8 mm | 6.31 x 6.31 x 2.91 in | 164 x 75 x 8.5 mm | 6.46 x 6.46 x 2.95 in | |
| Weight | 175 g | 6.17 oz | 184 g | 6.49 oz | |
| Body Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | ||
| Colors | Black, Rainbow Silver | Misty Silver, Pearl Blue, Slate Grey | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | 5000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | |
| Approximate price | 380 EUR | 150 EUR |
Screen
| Technology | AMOLED | IPS LCD | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
| Screen size | 6.43" inc | 6.5" inc | |
| Screen area | 99.8 cm2 | 103.5 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 20:9 (height:width) | 20:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 84.4% | 84.2% | |
| Screen resolution | 1080 x 2400 px | 720 x 1600 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 409 PPI | 268 PPI | |
| Other specs | - 430 nits (typ) -600 nits (HDM) -800 nits (peak) |
- 90Hz |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 48 MP, Triple | 16 MP, Triple | |
| Camera specs | -48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0'', 0.8µm, PDAF -2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) -2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
-16 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1.0µm, PDAF -2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) -2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
|
| Functions | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama | |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps | |
| Front camera, selfie | 16 MP, Single | 8 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | |
| Functions | Panorama | HDR | |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11 | |
| Chipset | - Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) | - Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | |
| Processor CPU | - Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | - Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | |
| Graphics processor GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G57 MP1 | |
| External memory | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | |
| Internal memory | 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 9 Total | 201431 | 155239 | |
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 308 | 313 | |
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 1372 | 1175 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Single SIM (Nano-SIM)Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE | |
Show all network frequencies: |
|||
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | |
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | |
| NFC | No | No | |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, USB On-The-Go | USB Type-C 2.0 | |
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.0, A2DP, LE | |
Music and Audio
| Radio | |||
| Headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | - Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | |
| Other extras |
- Fast charging 33W, 54% in 30 min -SuperVOOC 2.0 |
- Fast charge 18W - Water repellent design |
Share on Share on