Samsung Galaxy A12 vs ZTE Blade A51 compare
Smartphone 1
Remove
Samsung Galaxy A12
Smartphone 2
Remove
ZTE Blade A51
Smartphone 3
Samsung Galaxy A12 vs ZTE Blade A51
What is the difference between the Samsung Galaxy A12 and ZTE Blade A51? Which one is better? The answers to these questions and many more can be found here in this detailed comparison of the two phones. Discover the differences in specs between these two desirable devices, from screen size to battery life, in the table below. We have all the information you need to choose the best phone for you.
Common specs
| Brand and model | Samsung Galaxy A12 | ZTE Blade A51 | |
| Rating | (+0) | (+0) | |
| Review | Samsung Galaxy A12 Review | ZTE Blade A51 Review | |
| Release date | 2020, November 24 | 2021, May 08 | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 164 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm | 6.46 x 6.46 x 2.98 in | 166.5 x 75.6 x 8.5 mm | 6.56 x 6.56 x 2.98 in | |
| Weight | 205 g | 7.23 oz | 173.7 g | 6.13 oz | |
| Body Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Plastic | |
| Colors | Black, White, Blue, Red | Blue, Gray | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | 3200 mAh, Li-Ion, non-removable | |
| Approximate price | $ 170 | $ 119 |
Screen
| Technology | PLS IPS | LCD IPS | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
| Screen size | 6.5" inc | 6.52" inc | |
| Screen area | 102.0 cm2 | 102.6 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 20:9 (height:width) | 20:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 82.1% | 81.5% | |
| Screen resolution | 720 x 1600 px | 720 x 1600 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 270 PPI | 269 PPI |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 48 MP, Quad | 13 MP, Dual | |
| Camera specs | -48 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), AF -5 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide) -2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) -2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
-13 MP, (wide), 0.80 µm -5 MP, ƒ/ 2.4, (depth) |
|
| Functions | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash | |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps | |
| DxOMark Main Score | 90 | ||
| DxOMark Photo | 96 | ||
| DxOMark Video | 80 | ||
| Front camera, selfie | 8 MP, Single | 5 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 8 MP, f/2.2 | 5 MP | |
| Video | 1080p@30fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 10 | Android 11 (Go edition) | |
| Chipset | - Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12nm) | - Unisoc SC9863A (28nm) | |
| Processor CPU | - Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | - Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) | |
| Graphics processor GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | IMG8322 | |
| External memory | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC | |
| Internal memory | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 2GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 8 Total | 103760 | 101305 | |
| GeekBench 6 Single Core | 158 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 691 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 158 | 147 | |
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 930 | 808 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Single SIM (Nano-SIM)Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Dual SIM, dual stand-by (Nano SIM + Nano SIM) | |
| Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE | |
Show all network frequencies: |
|||
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot | |
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS | |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes | |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, USB On-The-Go | |
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE | |
| Harmful irradiation |
SAR EU - 0.67 W/kg (head) 1.38 W/kg (body) |
||
Music and Audio
| Radio | FM radio, RDS, recording | FM radio | |
| Headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer | - Fingerprint (rear-mounted), Proximity, Accelerometer | |
| Other extras |
- Fast charging 15W |
Share on Share on
