Samsung Galaxy A14 4G vs Umidigi Bison 2 Pro compare
Smartphone 1
Remove
Samsung Galaxy A14 4G
Smartphone 2
Remove
Umidigi Bison 2 Pro
Smartphone 3
Samsung Galaxy A14 4G vs Umidigi Bison 2 Pro
What is the difference between the Samsung Galaxy A14 4G and Umidigi Bison 2 Pro? Which one is better? The answers to these questions and many more can be found here in this detailed comparison of the two phones. Discover the differences in specs between these two desirable devices, from screen size to battery life, in the table below. We have all the information you need to choose the best phone for you.
Common specs
| Brand and model | Samsung Galaxy A14 4G | Umidigi Bison 2 Pro | |
| Rating | (+) | (+) | |
| Review | |||
| Release date | 2023, February 28 | 2022 | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 167.7 x 78 x 9.1 mm | 6.6 x 6.6 x 3.07 in | 172.1 x 83.8 x 12.9 mm | 6.78 x 6.78 x 3.3 in | |
| Weight | 201 g | 7.09 oz | 280 g | 9.88 oz | |
| Body Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | ||
| Colors | Black, Dark Red, Silver, Green | Black | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | 6150 mAh, , non-removable | |
| Approximate price | $ 160 |
Screen
| Technology | PLS LCD | ||
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
| Screen size | 6.6" inc | 6.5" inc | |
| Screen area | 104.9 cm2 | 102.0 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 20:9 (height:width) | 20:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 80.2% | 70.7% | |
| Screen resolution | 1080 x 2408 px | 1080 x 2400 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 400 PPI | 405 PPI | |
| Other specs | - - |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 50 MP, Triple | 48 MP, Triple | |
| Camera specs | -50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF -5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) -2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
-48 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF -16 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) -5 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
|
| Functions | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR | |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps | |
| Front camera, selfie | 13 MP, Single | 24 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 24 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 13, One UI Core 5 | Android 12 | |
| Chipset | - Mediatek MT6769 Helio G80 (12 nm)
- Exynos 850 (8nm) - USA |
- Mediatek Helio P90 (12 nm) | |
| Processor CPU | - Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - USA |
- Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | |
| Graphics processor GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | PowerVR GM9446 | |
| External memory | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | |
| Internal memory | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 9 Total | 145741 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Single Core | 213 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 1005 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 502 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 1600 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Single SIM (Nano-SIM)Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | |
Show all network frequencies: |
|||
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | |
| GPS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | |
| NFC | Yes | Yes | |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C, OTG | |
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE | |
| Harmful irradiation |
SAR EU - 0.46 W/kg (head) 1.37 W/kg (body) |
||
Music and Audio
| Radio | Wireless FM radio | ||
| Headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | - Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer (skin temperature) | |
| Other extras |
- Fast charging 15W |
- 18W Fast charging - IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) -MIL-STD-810G compliant |
Share on Share on
