vivo X7 vs Xiaomi Poco M8s compare
The best smartphone comparison tool: compare vivo X7 vs Xiaomi Poco M8s and choose the best model for you
Smartphone 2
Remove
Xiaomi Poco M8s
Smartphone 3
vivo X7 vs Xiaomi Poco M8s
What is the difference between the vivo X7 and Xiaomi Poco M8s? Which one is better? The answers to these questions and many more can be found here in this detailed comparison of the two phones. Discover the differences in specs between these two desirable devices, from screen size to battery life, in the table below. We have all the information you need to choose the best phone for you.
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | vivo X7 | Xiaomi Poco M8s | |
| Rating | (+) | (+) | |
| Review | |||
| Release date | 2016, June | 2026, April 21 | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 147.3 x 71.3 x 7.2 mm | 5.8 x 5.8 x 2.81 in | 169.4 x 80.4 x 8.4 mm | 6.67 x 6.67 x 3.17 in | |
| Weight | 151 g | 5.33 oz | 217 g | 7.65 oz | |
| Body Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | ||
| Colors | Gold, Rose Gold | Black, White | |
| Battery | 3000 mAh, Non-removable Li-Ion | 7000 mAh, Si/C Li-Ion | |
| Body Form | Xiaomi | ||
| Approximate price | 640 EUR | 160 EUR |
Screen
| Technology | Super AMOLED | AMOLED | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
| Screen size | 5.2" inc | 6.9" inc | |
| Screen area | 74.5 cm2 | 116.9 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 16:9 (height:width) | 19.5:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 71.0% | 85.8% | |
| Screen resolution | 1080 x 1920 px | 1080 x 2392 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 424 PPI | 374 PPI | |
| Other specs | - 144Hz, 700 nits (typ), 850 nits (peak) - |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 13 MP, Single | 50 MP, Dual | |
| Camera specs | -13 MP, PDAF, f/2.2 | -50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF -Auxiliary lens |
|
| Functions | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR | |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps | |
| Front camera, selfie | 16 MP, Single | 8 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 16 MP, f/2.0 | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | |
| Functions | LED flash | HDR | |
| Video | 1080p@30fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 5.1 (Lollipop); Funtouch 2.5 | Android 15, HyperOS 2 | |
| Chipset | - Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652 (28 nm) | - Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (6 nm) | |
| Processor CPU | - Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A72 & 4x1.4 GHz Cortex-A53) | - Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | |
| Graphics processor GPU | Adreno 510 | Adreno | |
| External memory | microSD, up to 256 GB (uses SIM 2 slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | |
| Internal memory | 64 GB, 4 GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 7 Total | |||
| GeekBench 6 Single Core | 288 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 812 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 276 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 1074 | ||
| GeekBench 4 Single Core | 1339 | ||
| GeekBench 4 Multi-Core | 3329 | ||
| GeekBench 4 RenderScript | 4023 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM/ Micro-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | |
| Network | GSM / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | |
Show all network frequencies: |
|||
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot | Wi-Fi, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | |
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | |
| NFC | Yes | ||
| USB | microUSB 2.0, USB Host | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | |
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP | 5.1, A2DP, LE | |
Music and Audio
| Radio | No | No | |
| Headphone jack | Yes | No | |
| Others | - 32-bit/192kHz audio -Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | - Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity , Infrared port | |
| Other extras |
- Fast battery charging |
- Virtual proximity sensor - 33W Fast charging -18W Reverse charging - IP64 dust tight and water resistant |
Share on Share on