Apple iPhone 13 Pro vs Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Smartphone 2
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha
Smartphone 3
Apple iPhone 13 Pro or Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Apple iPhone 13 Pro | Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha | |
| Rating | (+0) | (+0) | |
| Release date | 2021, September 14 | 2019, September | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 146.7 x 71.5 x 7.7 mm | 5.78 x 5.78 x 2.81 in | 154.4 x 72.3 x 10.4 mm | 6.08 x 6.08 x 2.85 in | |
| Weight | 204 g | 7.2 oz | 241 g | 8.5 oz | |
| Body Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass), glass back (Gorilla Glass), stainless steel frame | Glass front, glass back, titanium alloy frame (TC4) | |
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Graphite, Gold, Silver, Sierra Blue | Black | |
| Battery | 3095 mAh, Li-Ion, non-removable | 4050 mAh, Non-removable Li-Po | |
| Battery life |
Stand by time - Up to 22 h (multimedia) Music play - Up to 75 h |
||
| Approximate price | 1150 EUR | 2500 EUR | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | Super Retina XDR OLED | Flexible Super AMOLED | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
| Screen size | 6.1" in | 7.92" in | |
| Screen area | 90.2 cm2 | 201.8 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 19.5:9 (height:width) | ||
| Screen to body ratio | 86.0% | 180.8% | |
| Screen resolution | 1170 x 2532 px | 2088 x 2250 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 460 PPI | 388 PPI | |
| Screen protection | Scratch-resistant ceramic glass, oleophobic coating | ||
| Other specs | - Wide color gamut -True-tone -120Hz -HDR10 -Dolby Vision -1000 nits (HBM) -1200 nits (peak) |
||
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 12 MP, Quad | 108 MP, Triple | |
| Camera specs | -12 MP, f/1.5, 26mm (wide), 1.9µm, dual pixel PDAF, sensor-shift OIS -12 MP, f/2.8, 77mm (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom -12 MP, f/1.8, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), PDAF -TOF 3D LiDAR scanner (depth) |
-108 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/1.33", 0.8µm, PDAF, Laser AF -12 MP, f/2.0, 54mm (telephoto), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, Dual Pixel PDAF, 2x optical zoom -20 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/2.8", 1.0µm |
|
| Functions | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR (photo/panorama) | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | |
| Video | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 10‑bit HDR, Dolby Vision HDR (up to 60fps), ProRes, Cinematic mode, stereo sound rec. | 3240p@30fps, 2160p@30/60fps, 1080p@30/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps | |
| DxOMark Main Score | 137 | ||
| DxOMark Photo | 144 | ||
| DxOMark Video | 119 | ||
| Front camera, selfie | 12 MP, Dual | 108 MP, Triple | |
| Specifications | 12 MP, f/2.2, 23mm (wide), 1/3.6'' SL 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) |
uses main camera | |
| Functions | HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | |
| Video | 4K@24/25/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 3240p@30fps, 2160p@30/60fps, 1080p@30/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps | |
| DxOMark Selfie Score | 99 | ||
| DxOMark Photo | 102 | ||
| DxOMark Video | 95 |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | iOS 15 | Android 10 | |
| Chipset | - Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) | - Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ (7 nm) | |
| CPU | - Hexa-core (2x3.22 GHz Avalanche + 4xX.X GHz Blizzard) | - Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 485) | |
| GPU | Apple GPU (5-core graphics) | Adreno 640 (700 MHz) | |
| External memory | No | No | |
| Internal memory | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 512GB 6GB RAM, 1TB 6GB RAM | 512GB 12GB RAM, UFS3.0 |
Benchmark
| Antutu 10 Total | 1307197 | ||
| Antutu 10 CPU | 326624 | ||
| Antutu 10 GPU | 430591 | ||
| Antutu 10 Mem | 236128 | ||
| Antutu 10 UX | 326624 | ||
| Antutu 9 Total | 837856 | ||
| Antutu 8 Total | 480830 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Single Core | 2280 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 5507 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Metal | 19851 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 1705 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 4523 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Single SIM (Nano-SIM and/or eSIM)Dual SIM (Nano-SIM/eSIM, dual stand-by) | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM) CDMA 800 / 1900 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 CDMA2000 1xEV-DO -4G - LTE -5G - Sub6/mmWave |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE band 1(2100), 2(1900), 3(1800), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 34(2000), 38(2600), 39(1900), 40(2300), 41(2500) - China -5G - 5G SA / NSA / Sub6 / mmWave; N41/N78/N79 |
|
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A, 5G, EV-DO Rev.A 3.1 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A (7CA) Cat20 2048/150 Mbps, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA, hotspot | |
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | Yes, with dual-band A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | |
| NFC | Yes | ||
| USB | Lightning, USB 2.0 | Type-C 1.0 reversible connector | |
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | |
| Harmful irradiation |
SAR - 1.20 W/kg (head) 1.19 W/kg (body) SAR EU - 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.98 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
| Radio | No | No | |
| Headphone jack | No | No | |
| Others | - Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic |
Other features
| Sensors | - Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | |
| Other extras |
- Siri natural language commands and dictation -Ultra Wideband (UWB) support - Fast charging 23W, 50% in 30 min -USB Power Delivery 2.0 -MagSafe wireless charging 15W -Qi magnetic fast wireless charging 7.5W - IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 6m for 30 mins) -Apple Pay (Visa, MasterCard, AMEX certified) |
- Fast battery charging 40W |
Reviews and Opinions on Apple iPhone 13 Pro and Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!