BQ Aquaris E5 vs Samsung Galaxy A70 Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
BQ Aquaris E5
Smartphone 2
Samsung Galaxy A70
Smartphone 3
BQ Aquaris E5 or Samsung Galaxy A70 Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | BQ Aquaris E5 | Samsung Galaxy A70 | |
| Rating | (+0) | (+0) | |
| Release date | May, 2014 | 2019, March | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 142.0 x 71.0 x 8.7 mm | 5.59 x 5.59 x 2.8 in | 164.3 x 76.7 x 7.9 mm | 6.47 x 6.47 x 3.02 in | |
| Weight | 134 g | 4.73 oz | 183 g | 6.46 oz | |
| Body Build | Front glass, plastic body | ||
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Black, White | Coral, Blue, Black, White | |
| Battery | 2500 mAh, Li-Polymer, | 4500 mAh, Non-removable Li-Po | |
| Approximate price | 330 EUR | ||
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | LCD IPS | Super AMOLED | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
| Screen size | 5" in | 6.7" in | |
| Screen area | 108.4 cm2 | ||
| Screen format | 16:9 (height:width) | 20:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 68% | 86% | |
| Screen resolution | 720 x 1280 px | 1080 x 2400 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 292 PPI | 393 PPI | |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | ||
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 13 MP, Single | 32 MP, Triple | |
| Camera specs | -13 MP, ƒ/ 2.2, (wide), 1.10 µm | -32 MP, f/1.7, PDAF -8 MP, f/2.2, 12mm (ultrawide) -5 MP, f/2.2, depth sensor |
|
| Functions | Dual LED flash | LED flash, panorama, HDR | |
| Video | 2160p@30fps, 1080p@30/240fps | ||
| Front camera, selfie | 5 MP, Single | 32 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 5 MP, ƒ/ | 32 MP, f/2.0, 0.8µm | |
| Functions | HDR | ||
| Video | 1080p@30fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 5.0 Lollipop | Android 9.0 (Pie) | |
| Chipset | - MediaTek MT6582 (28 nm) | - Qualcomm SDM675 Snapdragon 675 (11 nm) | |
| CPU | - Quad-Core (4x Cortex A7 1.3 GHz) | - Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver) | |
| GPU | ARM Mali-400 MP2 | Adreno 612 | |
| External memory | microSD, up to 512 GB (dedicated slot) | ||
| Internal memory | 1GB 16GB, 1GB · 8GB 1GB · 16GB 2GB · 16GB · FHD 2GB · 16GB | 128 GB, 6/8 GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 8 Total | 210563 | ||
| Antutu 7 Total | |||
| GeekBench 6 Single Core | 607 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 1562 | ||
| GeekBench 6 OpenCL | 285 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Vulkan | 464 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 480 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 1528 | ||
| GeekBench 4 Single Core | 2341 | ||
| GeekBench 4 Multi-Core | 6600 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Dual SIM, dual stand-by (Micro SIM + Micro SIM) | Single SIM (Nano-SIM)Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | 2G / 3G / | GSM / HSPA / LTE | |
| Bands | -2G - B2 (1900), B3 (1800), B5 (850), B8 (900) -3G - B1 (2100), B8 (900) |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 20(800), 38(2600), 40(2300), 41(2500) |
|
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A | ||
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | 802.11b, 802.11g, 802.11n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, WiFi Direct, hotspot | |
| GPS | Yes | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | |
| NFC | No | Yes (market dependent) | |
| USB | Yes, USB On-The-Go (OTG) | 2.0, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector | |
| Bluetooth | , | 5.0, A2DP, LE | |
| Harmful irradiation |
SAR EU - 0.35 W/kg (head) 1.48 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
| Radio | Yes | FM radio | |
| Headphone jack | Yes | Yes | |
| Others | - Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic |
Other features
| Sensors | - Proximity, compass, gyro | - Fingerprint (under display), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | |
| Other extras |
- ANT+ - Fast battery charging 25W |
||
| Versions |
- Versions: SM-A705F/DS (Global); SM-A7050 (China) |
Reviews and Opinions on BQ Aquaris E5 and Samsung Galaxy A70
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!