BQ Aquaris U Lite vs Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1

BQ Aquaris U Lite
Smartphone 2

Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Smartphone 3
BQ Aquaris U Lite or Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
Brand and model | BQ Aquaris U Lite | Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite | |
Rating | (+) | (+) | |
Release date | September, 2016 | 2020, January | |
Dimensions (HxWxD) | 145.0 x 71.5 x 8.3 mm | 5.71 x 5.71 x 2.81 in | 162.5 x 75.6 x 8.1 mm | 6.4 x 6.4 x 2.98 in | |
Weight | 140 g | 4.94 oz | 186 g | 6.56 oz | |
Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
Colors | Gray | Prism White, Prism Black, Prism Blue | |
Battery | 3080 mAh, Li-Polymer, non-removable | 4500 mAh, Non-removable Li-Po | |
Approximate price | 650 EUR | ||
Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
Technology | Super AMOLED | ||
Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
Screen size | 5" in | 6.7" in | |
Screen area | 107.8 cm2 | ||
Screen format | 16:9 (height:width) | 20:9 (height:width) | |
Screen to body ratio | 66% | 87.8% | |
Screen resolution | 720 x 1280 px | 1080 x 2400 px | |
Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 294 PPI | 394 PPI | |
Screen protection | Scratch resistant | ||
Other specs | - 400 nits (typ) | - Always-on display -HDR10+ |
|
Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
Rear camera, main | 8 MP, Single | 48 MP, Triple | |
Camera specs | -8 MP, ƒ/ 2.0, (wide), 1.12 µm | -48 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, Super Steady OIS -12 MP, f/2.2, 12mm (ultrawide) -5 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (macro), 1/5.0", 1.12µm |
|
Functions | LED flash | LED flash, panorama, HDR | |
Video | 1080p video | 2160p@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS | |
Front camera, selfie | 5 MP, Single | 32 MP, Single | |
Specifications | 5 MP, ƒ/ 2.4, 1.12 µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/2.8'', 0.8µm | |
Functions | HDR | ||
Video | 1080p@30fps |
Performance
Operating system - OS | Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10.0; One UI 2.1 | |
Chipset | - Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 (28 nm) | - Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) | |
CPU | - Quad-Core (4x Cortex A53 1.4 GHz) | - Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) | |
GPU | Qualcomm Adreno 308 | Adreno 640 | |
External memory | microSD, up to 1 TB | ||
Internal memory | 2GB 16GB, 2GB · 16GB | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM |
Benchmark
Antutu 8 Total | 452004 | ||
GeekBench 5 Single Core | 688 | ||
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 2545 |
Communication and Connectivity
SIM card | Dual SIM, dual stand-by (Nano SIM + Nano SIM) | Single SIM (Nano-SIM)Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
Network | 2G / 3G / 4G / | GSM / HSPA / LTE | |
Bands | -2G - B2 (1900), B3 (1800), B5 (850), B8 (900) -3G - B1 (2100), B2 (1900), B5 (850), B8 (900) -4G - B1 (2100), B3 (1800), B7 (2600), B20 (800) |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE (unspecified) |
|
Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A | ||
GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
Edge | Yes | Yes | |
Wi-Fi | 802.11b, 802.11g, 802.11n,Wi-Fi Hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | |
GPS | GPS, A-GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | |
NFC | No | Yes | |
USB | Yes, USB On-The-Go (OTG) | 2.0, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector | |
Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.2, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE | |
Harmful irradiation |
SAR EU - 0.470 W/Kg (head), 1.160 W/Kg (body) |
SAR - 0.69 W/kg (head) 0.93 W/kg (body) SAR EU - 0.49 W/kg (head) 1.52 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
Radio | Yes | ||
Headphone jack | Yes | No | |
Others | - Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic |
Other features
Sensors | - Proximity, Accelerometer, compass, gyro | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | |
Other extras |
- ANT+ - Fast battery charging 45W |
||
Versions |
- Versions: SM-G770F/DS (Global); SM-G770F/DSM (Russia, India) |
Reviews and Opinions on BQ Aquaris U Lite and Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!