Energizer Energy 400 LTE vs Xiaomi Redmi Pro Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Energizer Energy 400 LTE
Smartphone 2
Xiaomi Redmi Pro
Smartphone 3
Energizer Energy 400 LTE or Xiaomi Redmi Pro Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Energizer Energy 400 LTE | Xiaomi Redmi Pro | |
| Rating | (+0) | (+0) | |
| Release date | 2017, Q3 | 2016, July | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 134 x 72 x 15 mm | 5.28 x 5.28 x 2.83 in | 151.5 x 76.2 x 8.2 mm | 5.96 x 5.96 x 3 in | |
| Weight | 204 g | 7.2 oz | 174 g | 6.14 oz | |
| Body Build | Front glass, aluminum body | ||
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Black | Silver, Gold, Gray | |
| Battery | 2500 mAh, Li-Ion | 4050 mAh, Non-removable Li-Ion | |
| Battery life |
Stand by time - Up to 420 h (3G) Talking time - Up to 16 h (3G) |
||
| Approximate price | 180 EUR | 170 EUR | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | TN TFT | AMOLED | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
| Screen size | 4" in | 5.5" in | |
| Screen area | 45.5 cm2 | 83.4 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 5:3 (height:width) | 16:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 47.2% | 72.2% | |
| Screen resolution | 480 x 800 px | 1080 x 1920 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 233 PPI | 401 PPI | |
| Screen protection | Asahi Dragontrail Glass | ||
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 8 MP, Single | 13 MP, Dual | |
| Camera specs | -8 MP, AF | -13 MP, f/2.0, PDAF -5 MP, depth sensor |
|
| Functions | LED flash, HDR | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps | |
| Front camera, selfie | 1.3 MP, Single | 5 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 1.3 MP | 5 MP, f/2.0 | |
| Video | 1080p@30fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 6.0 (Marshmallow) | Android 6.0 (Marshmallow); MIUI 10 | |
| Chipset | - Mediatek MT6737M (28 nm) | - Mediatek MT6797T Helio X25 (20 nm) - Mediatek MT6797 Helio X20 (20 nm) - Standard edition |
|
| CPU | - Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A53 | - Deca-core 2.5 GHz - Exclusive edition -Deca-core 2.3 GHz - High edition -Deca-core 2.1 GHz - Standard edition |
|
| GPU | Mali-T720MP2 | Mali-T880 MP4 | |
| External memory | microSD, up to 64 GB (uses SIM 2 slot) | microSD, up to 256 GB (uses SIM 2 slot) | |
| Internal memory | 8 GB, 1 GB RAM | 128 GB, 4 GB RAM - Exclusive edition 32/64 GB, 3 GB RAM - other editions |
Benchmark
| GeekBench 4 Single Core | 1648 | ||
| GeekBench 4 Multi-Core | 4014 | ||
| GeekBench 4 RenderScript | 3133 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Hybrid Dual SIM (Micro-SIM, dual stand-by) | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM/ Micro-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 -3G - HSDPA 900 / 2100 -4G - LTE band 3(1800), 7(2600), 20(800) |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 CDMA 800 / 1900 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 CDMA2000 1xEV-DO TD-SCDMA -4G - LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 38(2600), 39(1900), 40(2300), 41(2500) |
|
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | |
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS | |
| NFC | |||
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | Type-C 1.0 reversible connector | |
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE | |
| Harmful irradiation | SAR - 0.64 W/kg (head) 1.52 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio; recording | |
| Headphone jack | Yes | Yes | |
| Others | - Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic |
Other features
| Sensors | - Accelerometer | - Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass , Infrared port | |
| Other extras |
- IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 mins) |
Reviews and Opinions on Energizer Energy 400 LTE and Xiaomi Redmi Pro
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!