Energizer Energy E220 vs ZTE Blade V9 Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Energizer Energy E220
Smartphone 2
ZTE Blade V9
Smartphone 3
Energizer Energy E220 or ZTE Blade V9 Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Energizer Energy E220 | ZTE Blade V9 | |
| Rating | (+) | (+) | |
| Release date | 2019, February | 2018, February | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 119 x 59 x 16.5 mm | 4.69 x 4.69 x 2.32 in | 151.4 x 70.6 x 7.5 mm | 5.96 x 5.96 x 2.78 in | |
| Weight | 112 g | 3.95 oz | 140 g | 4.94 oz | |
| Body Build | Front/back glass, aluminum frame | ||
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Black, Dark blue | Black, Gold, Blue, Grey | |
| Battery | 1000 mAh, Li-Ion | 3100 mAh, Non-removable Li-Ion | |
| Approximate price | 150 EUR | ||
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | TFT | S-IPS LCD | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | ||
| Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
| Screen size | 2.2" in | 5.7" in | |
| Screen area | 15.0 cm2 | 83.8 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 4:3 (height:width) | 18:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 21.3% | 78.4% | |
| Screen resolution | 240 x 320 px | 1080 x 2160 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 182 PPI | 424 PPI | |
| Other specs | - MiFavor 6 | ||
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 0.3 MP, Single | 16 MP, Dual | |
| Camera specs | -0.3 MP | -16 MP, f/1.8, 1.12µm, PDAF -5 MP, f/2.4, depth sensor |
|
| Functions | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR | ||
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps | |
| Front camera, selfie | 0 MP, | 8 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | No | 8 MP, f/2.0 | |
| Functions | LED flash | ||
| Video | 1080p@30fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | KaiOS | Android 8.1 (Oreo) | |
| Chipset | - Mediatek MT6572 (28 nm) | - Qualcomm SDM450 Snapdragon 450 (14 nm) | |
| CPU | - Dual-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 | - Octa-core 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 | |
| GPU | Mali-400 | Adreno 506 | |
| External memory | microSD, up to 32 GB | microSD, up to 256 GB (uses SIM 2 slot) | |
| Internal memory | 512 MB, 256 MB RAM | 32/64 GB, 4 GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 7 Total | |||
| GeekBench 4 Single Core | 772 | ||
| GeekBench 4 Multi-Core | 3931 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Dual SIM (Micro-SIM, dual stand-by) | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | GSM / HSPA | GSM / HSPA / LTE | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE |
|
| Speed | HSPA | HSPA, LTE | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | |
| GPS | No | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS | |
| NFC | Yes (64 GB model only) | ||
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 | |
| Bluetooth | 2.1 | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
Music and Audio
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio | |
| Headphone jack | Yes | Yes | |
| Others | - Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | ||
| Other extras |
- Charging 5V/2A 10W |
Reviews and Opinions on Energizer Energy E220 and ZTE Blade V9
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!
