FOSSiBOT F101 vs FOSSiBOT F102 Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
FOSSiBOT F101
Smartphone 2
FOSSiBOT F102
Smartphone 3
Differences between FOSSiBOT F101 and FOSSiBOT F102 - Which to Choose?
Reasons to consider the FOSSiBOT F101:
- Lighter weight at 350g compared to the F102 at 495g, making it easier to carry.
- Smaller form factor with dimensions 155.7 x 76.2 x 20.4 mm, potentially more comfortable for users who prefer compact devices.
- Offers fast wireless charging capability, which is not mentioned for the F102.
- Antutu score is 92004, for those interested in the performance metrics of this device (though direct comparison to another Antutu score would be required for this to be meaningful).
Reasons to consider the FOSSiBOT F102:
- Larger screen size of 6.58 inches with a higher resolution of 1080x2220 pixels, potentially better for media consumption and gaming.
- Higher capacity battery of 16500mAh, suggesting longer battery life between charges.
- More powerful chipset (MediaTek Helio G99) and higher RAM (12GB), which could translate to better performance.
- Superior camera setup with a 108 MP main camera and higher resolution front camera (32 MP).
- Built-in FM radio and a unique flashlight feature with 300 LED lights, providing additional functionality.
- Faster wired charging at 33W, reducing the device's charging time.
- Higher Antutu score of 387294 and overall Antutu V10 score of 451932, indicating potentially greater benchmark performance.
Both devices are rugged smartphones with durability features such as IP68 rating, but the choice depends on specific features the user values more, such as battery life, camera quality, or device size.
FOSSiBOT F101 or FOSSiBOT F102 Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | FOSSiBOT F101 | FOSSiBOT F102 | |
| Rating | (+0) | (+0) | |
| Release date | March, 2023 | 2023 | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 155.7 x 76.2 x 20.4 mm | 6.13 x 6.13 x 3 in | 172.3 x 82.6 x 25.6 mm | 6.78 x 6.78 x 3.25 in | |
| Weight | 350 g | 12.35 oz | 495 g | 17.46 oz | |
| Body Build | Rugged Smartphone, Polycarbonate, Corning Gorilla Glass | Rugged Smartphone | |
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Black, Red, Orange | Black, Red | |
| Battery | 10600 mAh, Li-Polymer, non-removable | 16500 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | |
| Approximate price | $ 269 | ||
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | LCD IPS | IPS display | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive | |
| Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
| Screen size | 5.45" in | 6.58" in | |
| Screen area | |||
| Screen format | 20:9 (height:width) | 20:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 51% | 84% | |
| Screen resolution | 720 x 1440 px | 1080x2220 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 295 PPI | 401 PPI | |
| Screen protection | Scratch resistant | Dragontrail Glass | |
| Other specs | - 120 Hz | - 450 nits (typ) -400 nits (min) -120 Hz |
|
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 24 MP, Triple | 108 MP, Triple | |
| Camera specs | -24 MP, ƒ/ 1.8, (wide), -5 MP, ƒ/ 1.8, (macro), -0.3 MP, (depth) |
-108 MP (wide), f/1.79, 1/1.52", PDAF -20 MP (night vision), f/2.2 -5 MP (macro), f/2.0, 1/2" |
|
| Functions | Dual LED flash | 300 LED lights, full brightness: 1000MA | |
| Video | 1080p video | 1080p@30fps | |
| Front camera, selfie | 0 MP, Single | 32 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | MP | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.76" | |
| Video | 1080p@30fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 13 Tiramisu | Android 13.0 | |
| Chipset | - MediaTek Helio A22 (MT6761) (12 nm) | - MediaTek Helio G99 (MT6789) (6 nm) | |
| CPU | - Quad-Core (4x Cortex A53 2.0 GHz) | - Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | |
| GPU | IMG PowerVR GE-class GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | |
| External memory | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | |
| Internal memory | 4GB 64GB | 256GB 12GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 10 Total | 451932 | ||
| Antutu 9 Total | 92004 | 387294 | |
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 546 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 1847 | ||
| GeekBench 4 Single Core | 723 | ||
| GeekBench 4 Multi-Core | 2014 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Dual SIM, dual stand-by (Nano SIM + Nano SIM) | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM) | |
| Network | 2G / 3G / 4G / | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | |
| Bands | -2G - CDMA BC0 (800), CDMA BC1 (1900), B2 (1900), B3 (1800), B5 (850), B8 (900) -3G - B1 (2100), B2 (1900), B4 (1700/2100 AWS A-F), B5 (850), B6 (800), B8 (900), B19 (800) -4G - B1 (2100), B2 (1900), B3 (1800), B4 (1700/2100 AWS 1), B5 (850), B7 (2600), B8 (900), B12 (700), B13 (700), B17 (700), B18 (800), B19 (800), B20 (800), B25 (1900+), B26 (850), B28b (700), B28a (700), B38 (TDD 2600), B39 (TDD 1900), B40 (TDD 2300), B41 (TDD 2500), B66 (1700/2100), B71 (600) |
-2G - 850/900/1800/1900MHz -3G - B1/B2/B4/B5/B8 -4G - B38/ B39/ B40/ B41/ B1/ B2/ B3/ B4/ B5/ B7/ B8/ B12/ B17/ B18/ B19/ B20/ B25/ B26/ B28A/ B28B/ B66/ B71 |
|
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | ||
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | 802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, 802.11n, 802.11n 5GHz, 802.11ac,Dual band ,Wi-Fi Hotspot ,Wi-Fi Direct ,Wi-Fi Display | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, Beidou, QZSS | |
| NFC | Yes | Yes | |
| USB | Yes, USB Type C, USB On-The-Go (OTG) | USB Type-C, OTG | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
Music and Audio
| Radio | No | FM radio | |
| Headphone jack | No | No | |
| Others |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (side-mounted), Proximity, Accelerometer, compass, gyro, Magnetometer, Pedometer , Infrared port | - Fingerprint, Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | |
| Other extras |
- Wireless charging - -Fast charging 18.0W - Resistance certificates (dust, water) -IP68, MIL-STD-810G -IP69K |
- Flashlight with 300 LED lights - Fast charging 33W - IP68 dust/water resistant |
Reviews and Opinions on FOSSiBOT F101 and FOSSiBOT F102
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!
