Gigaset GS290 vs Samsung Galaxy S9+ Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Gigaset GS290
Smartphone 2
Samsung Galaxy S9+
Smartphone 3
Gigaset GS290 or Samsung Galaxy S9+ Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Gigaset GS290 | Samsung Galaxy S9+ | |
| Rating | (+) | (+) | |
| Release date | November, 2019 | 2018, February | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 157.0 x 75.1 x 9.7 mm | 6.18 x 6.18 x 2.96 in | 158.1 x 73.8 x 8.5 mm | 6.22 x 6.22 x 2.91 in | |
| Weight | 190 g | 6.7 oz | 189 g | 6.67 oz | |
| Body Build | Front/back glass (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | ||
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Black, White | Midnight Black, Coral Blue, Titanium Gray, Lilac Purple, Burgundy Red, Sunrise Gold, Ice Blue, Polaris Blue | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh, Li-Ion, non-removable | 3500 mAh, Non-removable Li-Ion | |
| Approximate price | $ 172 | 620 EUR | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | LCD IPS | Super AMOLED | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
| Screen size | 6.3" in | 6.2" in | |
| Screen area | 98.3 cm2 | ||
| Screen format | 19.5:9 (height:width) | 18.5:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 82% | 84.2% | |
| Screen resolution | 1080 x 2340 px | 1440 x 2960 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 409 PPI | 529 PPI | |
| Screen protection | Scratch resistant | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | |
| Other specs | - 430 nits (typ) | - HDR10 -3D Touch (home button only) -Always-on display |
|
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 13 MP, Dual | 12 MP, Dual | |
| Camera specs | -13 MP, Unknow, (wide), -2 MP, ƒ/ , (depth) |
-12 MP, f/1.5-2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.55'', 1.4µm, Dual Pixel PDAF, OIS -12 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.6'', 1.0µm, AF, OIS, 2x optical zoom |
|
| Functions | Dual LED flash | LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama | |
| Video | 1080p video | 2160p@60fps, 1080p@240fps, 720p@960fps, HDR, dual-video rec. | |
| DxOMark Main Score | 100 | ||
| DxOMark Photo | 105 | ||
| DxOMark Video | 91 | ||
| Front camera, selfie | 16 MP, Single | 8 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 16 MP, ƒ/ | 8 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/3.6'', 1.22µm, AF | |
| Functions | Dual video call, Auto-HDR | ||
| Video | 1440p@30fps | ||
| DxOMark Selfie Score | 81 | ||
| DxOMark Photo | 81 | ||
| DxOMark Video | 81 |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 9.0 P | Android 8.0 (Oreo) | |
| Chipset | - MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) (16 nm) | - Exynos 9810 Octa (10 nm) - Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm) - USA/LATAM, China |
|
| CPU | - Octa-Core (4x Cortex A53 2.5 GHz + 4x Cortex A53 1.6 GHz) | - Octa-core (4x2.7 GHz Mongoose M3 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - EMEA -Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Kryo 385 Gold & 4x1.7 GHz Kryo 385 Silver) - USA/LATAM, China |
|
| GPU | ARM Mali-G71 MP2 | Mali-G72 MP18 - EMEA Adreno 630 - USA/LATAM, China |
|
| External memory | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSD, up to 512 GB (uses SIM 2 slot) - dual SIM model only | |
| Internal memory | 4GB 64GB, 4GB · 64GB | 64/128/256 GB, 6 GB RAM - China 128 GB, 6 GB RAM - LATAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 8 Total | 320731 | ||
| Antutu 7 Total | |||
| GeekBench 6 Single Core | 511 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 1781 | ||
| GeekBench 6 OpenCL | 2023 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Vulkan | 1981 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 596 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 1902 | ||
| GeekBench 4 Single Core | 2292 | ||
| GeekBench 4 Multi-Core | 8306 | ||
| GeekBench 4 RenderScript | 8586 | ||
| GeekBench 4 Battery | 4096 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Dual SIM, dual stand-by (Nano SIM + Nano SIM) | Single SIM (Nano-SIM)Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | 2G / 3G / 4G / | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | |
| Bands | -2G - B2 (1900), B3 (1800), B5 (850), B8 (900) -3G - B1 (2100), B8 (900) -4G - B1 (2100), B3 (1800), B5 (850), B7 (2600), B8 (900), B20 (800) |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) CDMA 800 / 1900 - USA -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global, USA CDMA2000 1xEV-DO - USA -4G - LTE band 1(2100), 2(1900), 3(1800), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 12(700), 13(700), 17(700), 18(800), 19(800), 20(800), 25(1900), 26(850), 28(700), 32(1500), 38(2600), 39(1900), 40(2300), 41(2500), 66(1700/2100) - Global LTE band 1(2100), 2(1900), 3(1800), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 12(700), 13(700), 14(700), 17(700), 18(800), 19(800), 20(800), 25(1900), 26(850), 28(700), 29(700), 30(2300), 38(2600), 39(1900), 40(2300), 41(2500), 46, 66(1700/2100), 71(600) - USA |
|
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A (6CA) Cat18 1200/200 Mbps | ||
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | 802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, 802.11n, 802.11n 5GHz, 802.11ac,Dual band ,Wi-Fi Hotspot ,Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | |
| NFC | Yes | Yes | |
| USB | Yes, USB Type C, USB On-The-Go (OTG) | 3.1, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.2, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX |
Music and Audio
| Radio | Yes | FM radio (USA & Canada only) | |
| Headphone jack | Yes | Yes | |
| Others | - 32-bit/384kHz audio -Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (rear-mounted), Proximity, Accelerometer, gyro , Infrared port | - Iris scanner, fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, heart rate, SpO2 | |
| Other extras |
- Fast charging 18.0W |
- Samsung DeX (desktop experience support) -ANT+ -Bixby natural language commands and dictation - -Fast battery charging (Quick Charge 2.0) -Qi/PMA wireless charging (market dependent) - Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) -IP68 dust/water proof (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) |
|
| Versions |
- Versions: G965F (Europe, Global Single-SIM); G965F/DS (Europe, Global Dual-SIM); G965U (USA); G965W (Canada); G9650 (China, LATAM) |
Reviews and Opinions on Gigaset GS290 and Samsung Galaxy S9+
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!