Google Pixel vs Samsung Galaxy Note 4 Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Google Pixel
Smartphone 2
Samsung Galaxy Note 4
Smartphone 3
Google Pixel or Samsung Galaxy Note 4 Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
Brand and model | Google Pixel | Samsung Galaxy Note 4 | |
Rating | (+) | (+) | |
Release date | 2016, October | 2014, September | |
Dimensions (HxWxD) | 143.8 x 69.5 x 8.5 mm | 5.66 x 5.66 x 2.74 in | 153.5 x 78.6 x 8.5 mm | 6.04 x 6.04 x 3.09 in | |
Weight | 143 g | 5.04 oz | 176 g | 6.21 oz | |
Body Build | Front glass, aluminum body, partial glass back | Front glass, aluminum frame, plastic back | |
Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
Colors | Quite Black, Very Silver, Really Blue | Frosted white, Charcoal black, Bronze Gold, Blossom Pink | |
Battery | 2770 mAh, Non-removable Li-Ion | 3220 mAh, Removable Li-Ion | |
Battery life |
Stand by time - Up to 456 h (3G) Talking time - Up to 26 h (3G) Music play - Up to 110 h |
Talking time - Up to 20 h (3G) Music play - Up to 82 h |
|
Approximate price | 290 EUR | 350 EUR | |
Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
Technology | AMOLED | Super AMOLED | |
Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
Screen size | 5" in | 5.7" in | |
Screen area | 68.9 cm2 | 88.5 cm2 | |
Screen format | 16:9 (height:width) | 16:9 (height:width) | |
Screen to body ratio | 69.0% | 73.4% | |
Screen resolution | 1080 x 1920 px | 1440 x 2560 px | |
Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 441 PPI | 518 PPI | |
Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 4 | |
Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
Rear camera, main | 12.3 MP, Single | 16 MP, Single | |
Camera specs | -12.3 MP, f/2.0, 1/2.3'', 1.55µm, PDAF & laser AF | -16 MP, f/2.2, 31mm (standard), 1/2.6'', 1.12µm, OIS, AF | |
Functions | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR | |
Video | 2160p@30fps, 1080p@60/120fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS), 720p@240fps | 2160p@30fps, 1080p@60fps, dual-video rec. | |
DxOMark Main Score | 90 | ||
DxOMark Photo | 90 | ||
DxOMark Video | 91 | ||
Front camera, selfie | 8 MP, Single | 3.7 MP, Single | |
Specifications | 8 MP, f/2.4, 1/3.2'', 1.4µm | 3.7 MP, f/1.9, 22mm (wide) | |
Functions | HDR | ||
Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps |
Performance
Operating system - OS | Android 7.1 (Nougat), upgradable to Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 4.4.4 (KitKat), upgradable to 6.0.1 (Marshmallow) | |
Chipset | - Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 821 (14 nm) | - Exynos 5433 - Qualcomm APQ8084 Snapdragon 805 (28 nm) |
|
CPU | - Quad-core (2x2.15 GHz Kryo & 2x1.6 GHz Kryo) | - Quad-core 2.7 GHz Krait 450 - Snapdragon 805 -Octa-core (4x1.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A57) - Exynos 5433 |
|
GPU | Adreno 530 | Adreno 420 (Snapdragon 805) Mali-T760 MP6 (Exynos 5433) |
|
External memory | No | microSD, up to 256 GB (dedicated slot) | |
Internal memory | 32/128 GB, 4 GB RAM | 32 GB, 3 GB RAM |
Benchmark
Antutu 7 Total | |||
GeekBench 6 Single Core | 326 | ||
GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 755 | ||
GeekBench 6 OpenCL | 2484 | ||
GeekBench 6 Vulkan | 996 | ||
GeekBench 5 Single Core | 307 | ||
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 848 | ||
GeekBench 4 Single Core | 1626 | 973 | |
GeekBench 4 Multi-Core | 4014 | 3223 | |
GeekBench 4 RenderScript | 7705 | 2621 | |
GeekBench 4 Battery | 1738 | 1038 |
Communication and Connectivity
SIM card | Nano-SIM | Micro-SIM | |
Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE | |
Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 -3G - HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE band 1(2100), 2(1900), 3(1800), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 12(700), 13(700), 17(700), 18(800), 19(800), 20(800), 21(1500), 26(850), 28(700), 32(1500), 38(2600), 39(1900), 40(2300), 41(2500) |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 HSDPA 850 / 1700 / 1900 / 2100 - N910W8 -4G - LTE band 1(2100), 2(1900), 3(1800), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 17(700), 20(800) - N910F, N910C LTE band 1(2100), 2(1900), 3(1800), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 28(700), 38(2600), 40(2300) - N910G LTE band 1(2100), 2(1900), 3(1800), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 12(700), 17(700) - N910W8 LTE band 1(2100), 2(1900), 3(1800), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 28(700) - N910U |
|
Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A (3CA) Cat9 450/50 Mbps or LTE-A (3CA) Cat11 600/75 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps (Exynos 5433)HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A Cat6 300/50 Mbps (Snapdragon 805) | |
GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
Edge | Yes | Yes | |
Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | |
GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS | |
NFC | Yes | Yes | |
USB | 3.0, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector | microUSB 2.0 (MHL 3 TV-out), USB Host | |
Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE, aptX | 4.1, A2DP, EDR, LE | |
Harmful irradiation |
SAR - 0.92 W/kg (head) 0.58 W/kg (body) SAR EU - 0.33 W/kg (head) 0.61 W/kg (body) |
SAR - 0.37 W/kg (head) 0.88 W/kg (body) SAR EU - 0.37 W/kg (head) 0.38 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
Radio | No | No | |
Headphone jack | Yes | Yes | |
Others | - Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic | - 24-bit/192kHz audio -Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic |
Other features
Sensors | - Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | - Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, gesture, UV, heart rate, SpO2 , Infrared port | |
Other extras |
- Fast battery charging - Splash and dust resistant |
- -ANT+ -S-Voice natural language commands and dictation -Air gestures --Stylus - Fast battery charging (Quick Charge 2.0) |
|
Versions |
- Versions: Global, USA, North America |
- Versions: N910F (Europe); N910K/N910L/N910S (Korea); N910C (Asia, Europe, South America); N910FD (United Arab Emirates); N910FQ (Turkey); N910H (Asia-Pacific); N910G (Singapore, India, Australia); N91 |
Reviews and Opinions on Google Pixel and Samsung Galaxy Note 4
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!