Honor 200 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A35 Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Honor 200 Pro
Smartphone 2
Samsung Galaxy A35
Smartphone 3
Honor 200 Pro or Samsung Galaxy A35 Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Honor 200 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A35 | |
| Rating | (+0) | (+0) | |
| Release date | 2024, May 27 | 2024, March 11 | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 163.3 x 75.2 x 8.2 mm | 6.43 x 6.43 x 2.96 in | 161.7 x 78 x 8.2 mm | 6.37 x 6.37 x 3.07 in | |
| Weight | 199 g | 7.02 oz | 209 g | 7.37 oz | |
| Body Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), plastic frame, glass back | ||
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Moonlight White, Black, Ocean Cyan, Pink | Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh, Si/C, non-removable | 5000 mAh, Li-Ion, non-removable | |
| Approximate price | € 539.4 | $ 251.99 | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | OLED | Super AMOLED | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 1B | 16M | |
| Screen size | 6.78" in | 6.6" in | |
| Screen area | 111.5 cm2 | 106.9 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 19.5:9 (height:width) | ||
| Screen to body ratio | 90.8% | 84.8% | |
| Screen resolution | 1224 x 2700 px | 1080 x 2340 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 437 PPI | 390 PPI | |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | ||
| Other specs | - 120Hz, HDR, 4000 nits (peak) - |
- 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) -Always-on display |
|
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 50 MP, Triple | 50 MP, Triple | |
| Camera specs | -50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS -50 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom -12 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), AF |
-50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.96", PDAF, OIS -8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm -5 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
|
| Functions | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR | |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | |
| DxOMark Main Score | 137 | ||
| DxOMark Photo | 138 | ||
| DxOMark Video | 134 | ||
| Front camera, selfie | 50 MP, Dual | 13 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 50 MP, f/2.1, (wide) 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm | |
| Functions | HDR | ||
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, MagicOS 8 | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 | |
| Chipset | - Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) | - Exynos 1380 (5 nm) | |
| CPU | - Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) | - Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | |
| GPU | Adreno 735 | Mali-G68 MP5 | |
| External memory | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | |
| Internal memory | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 10 Total | 1176556 | 587481 | |
| Antutu 10 CPU | 277492 | 191502 | |
| Antutu 10 GPU | 445527 | 166953 | |
| Antutu 10 Mem | 232651 | 93544 | |
| Antutu 10 UX | 277492 | 191502 | |
| GeekBench 6 Single Core | 1017 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 2988 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Nano-SIM, eSIM or Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM, eSIM or Hybrid SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 CDMA 800 -3G - HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 CDMA2000 1x -4G - LTE -5G - SA/NSA |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 -5G - 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 26, 28, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
|
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | |
| GPS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) | |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | |
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE | |
| Harmful irradiation |
SAR - 0.81 W/kg (head) SAR EU - 0.44 W/kg (head) 0.92 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
| Radio | No | No | |
| Headphone jack | No | No | |
| Others |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, ultrasound proximity , Infrared port | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity | |
| Other extras |
- Circle to Search - 100W Fast charging, 60% in 15 min, 100% in 41 min -66W Wireless charging, 64% in 30 min -5W Reverse charging -Reverse Wireless charging - IP65 (Int'l), IP55 (China), dust and water resistant |
- Circle to Search - 25W Fast charging - IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
Reviews and Opinions on Honor 200 Pro and Samsung Galaxy A35
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!