Honor 90 vs Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1

Honor 90
Smartphone 2

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Smartphone 3
Differences between Honor 90 and Samsung Galaxy A54 5G - Which to Choose?
Huawei Honor 90:
- Superior Camera: The Honor 90 boasts a 200 MP primary camera, significantly higher than the A54's 50 MP. This could translate to better image quality, especially in terms of detail and clarity.
- More RAM Options: It offers variants with up to 16GB of RAM, which is beneficial for heavy multitasking and more demanding applications.
- Higher Battery Charging Speed: With 66W fast charging, it can recharge its battery much faster than the A54 5G.
- Display Quality: The Honor 90 has a higher screen resolution (1200 x 2664) compared to the A54 5G, which could mean sharper and clearer display.
- Processor: Equipped with the Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 chipset, it might offer better performance in certain tasks compared to the Exynos 1380 of the A54.
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G:
- Durability: The Galaxy A54 5G has IP67 dust/water resistance, offering better protection against environmental factors.
- Expandable Storage: Unlike the Honor 90, it supports microSDXC, providing the option to expand storage.
- Slightly Smaller and Lighter: It is marginally more compact and lighter than the Honor 90, which might be preferable for ease of handling.
- Screen Protection: Comes with Corning Gorilla Glass 5, which is known for its durability and resistance to damage.
- Cost: It is priced slightly lower (400 EUR) than the Honor 90 (450 USD), making it a more budget-friendly option.
Conclusion:
Choose Huawei Honor 90 if: you prioritize camera performance, faster charging, and a more powerful processor.
Choose Samsung Galaxy A54 5G if: you prefer a more durable and slightly cheaper phone with expandable storage and a protected screen.
Each phone has its strengths, so the better choice depends on which features are more important to you.
Honor 90 or Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
Brand and model | Honor 90 | Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | |
Rating | 0) | (+0) | (+|
Release date | 2023, May 29 | 2023, March 14 | |
Dimensions (HxWxD) | 161.9 x 74.1 x 7.8 mm | 6.37 x 6.37 x 2.92 in | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm | 6.23 x 6.23 x 3.02 in | |
Weight | 183 g | 6.46 oz | 202 g | 7.13 oz | |
Body Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame | ||
Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
Colors | Midnight Black, Emerald Green, Diamond Silver, Peacock Blue | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White | |
Battery | 5000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | 5000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | |
Approximate price | € 304.9 | 400 EUR | |
Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
Technology | AMOLED | Super AMOLED | |
Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
Display colors | 1B | 16M | |
Screen size | 6.7" in | 6.4" in | |
Screen area | 108.9 cm2 | 100.5 cm2 | |
Screen format | 19.5:9 (height:width) | ||
Screen to body ratio | 90.8% | 82.9% | |
Screen resolution | 1200 x 2664 px | 1080 x 2340 px | |
Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 435 PPI | 403 PPI | |
Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | ||
Other specs | - 120Hz, HDR10+, 1600 nits (peak) - |
- 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) | |
Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
Rear camera, main | 200 MP, Triple | 50 MP, Triple | |
Camera specs | -200 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, PDAF -12 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), AF -2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
-50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS -12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm -5 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
|
Functions | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR | |
Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps | |
DxOMark Main Score | 122 | 104 | |
DxOMark Photo | 128 | 106 | |
DxOMark Video | 126 | 115 | |
Front camera, selfie | 50 MP, Single | 32 MP, Single | |
Specifications | 50 MP, f/2.4, 100˚, (ultrawide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8'', 0.8µm | |
Functions | HDR | HDR | |
Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
Performance
Operating system - OS | Android 13, MagicOS 7.1 | Android 13, One UI 5.1 | |
Chipset | - Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 Accelerated Edition (4 nm) | - Exynos 1380 (5 nm) | |
CPU | - Octa-core (1x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | - Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | |
GPU | Adreno 644 | Mali-G68 MP5 | |
External memory | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | |
Internal memory | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
Benchmark
Antutu 10 Total | 676182 | 590616 | |
Antutu 10 CPU | 202884 | 191351 | |
Antutu 10 GPU | 168740 | 136765 | |
Antutu 10 Mem | 169676 | 112999 | |
Antutu 10 UX | 202884 | 191351 | |
Antutu 9 Total | 551000 | 512020 | |
GeekBench 6 Single Core | 960 | 977 | |
GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 2797 | 2760 | |
GeekBench 6 OpenCL | 3007 | ||
GeekBench 6 Vulkan | 3015 | ||
GeekBench 5 Single Core | 783 | 777 | |
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 2659 | 2600 | |
GeekBench 4 Single Core | 3602 | ||
GeekBench 4 Multi-Core | 11055 |
Communication and Connectivity
SIM card | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, eSIM, dual stand-by) or Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Single SIM (Nano-SIM, eSIM) or Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
Network | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | |
Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 CDMA 800 -3G - HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 CDMA2000 1x -4G - 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 -5G - 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE -5G - SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave |
|
Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G | |
GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
Edge | Yes | Yes | |
Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | |
GPS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | |
NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) | |
USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | |
Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE | |
Harmful irradiation |
SAR - 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) SAR EU - 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
Radio | No | No | |
Headphone jack | No | No | |
Others |
Other features
Sensors | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, ultrasound proximity | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) | |
Other extras |
- 66W Fast charging -5W Reverse charging |
- Fast charging 25W - IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 mins) |
Reviews and Opinions on Honor 90 and Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!