Huawei Mate 50 Pro vs Huawei Mate 40 Pro Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
Smartphone 2
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
Smartphone 3
Huawei Mate 50 Pro or Huawei Mate 40 Pro Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Huawei Mate 50 Pro | Huawei Mate 40 Pro | |
| Rating | (+0) | (+0) | |
| Release date | 2022, September 06 | 2020, October 22 | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 162.1 x 75.5 x 8.5 mm | 6.38 x 6.38 x 2.97 in | 162.9 x 75.5 x 9.1 mm | 6.41 x 6.41 x 2.97 in | |
| Weight | 205 g | 7.23 oz | 212 g | 7.48 oz | |
| Body Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | ||
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Black, Silver, Purple, Orange | Mystic Silver, White, Black, Green, Yellow | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | 4400 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | |
| Approximate price | 990 EUR | 1200 EUR | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | OLED | OLED | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 1B | 16M | |
| Screen size | 6.74" in | 6.76" in | |
| Screen area | 111.8 cm2 | 115.7 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 19.5:9 (height:width) | 18.5:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 91.3% | 94.1% | |
| Screen resolution | 1212 x 2616 px | 1344 x 2772 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 428 PPI | 456 PPI | |
| Screen protection | Huawei Kunlun Glass | ||
| Other specs | - 120Hz | - HDR10 -90Hz |
|
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 50 MP, Triple | 50 MP, Triple | |
| Camera specs | -50 MP, f/1.4-f/4.0, 24mm (wide), PDAF, Laser AF, OIS -64 MP, f/3.5, 90mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom -13 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), PDAF |
-50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.28'', 1.22µm, omnidirectional PDAF, Laser AF -12 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom -20 MP, f/1.8, 18mm (ultrawide), PDAF |
|
| Functions | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Leica optics, LED flash, panorama, HDR | |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/480fps, 720p@960fps, 720p@3840fps, HDR, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/480fps, 720p@960fps, 720p@3840fps, HDR, gyro-EIS | |
| DxOMark Main Score | 149 | 136 | |
| DxOMark Photo | 152 | 140 | |
| DxOMark Video | 141 | 116 | |
| Front camera, selfie | 13 MP, Single | 13 MP, Dual | |
| Specifications | 13 MP, f/2.4, 18mm (ultrawide) TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) |
13 MP, f/2.4, 18mm (ultrawide) TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) |
|
| Functions | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama | |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps | |
| DxOMark Selfie Score | 145 | 104 | |
| DxOMark Photo | 147 | 110 | |
| DxOMark Video | 143 | 96 |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | EMUI 13 (International); HarmonyOS 3.0 (China) | Android 10, EMUI 11, no Google Play Services | |
| Chipset | - Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 4G (4 nm) | - HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G (5 nm) | |
| CPU | - Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | - Octa-core (1x3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x2.05 GHz Cortex-A55) | |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G78 MP24 | |
| External memory | NM (Nano Memory), up to 256GB (uses shared SIM slot) | NM (Nano Memory), up to 256GB (uses shared SIM slot) | |
| Internal memory | 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 10 Total | 1130696 | ||
| Antutu 10 CPU | 307526 | ||
| Antutu 10 GPU | 424162 | ||
| Antutu 10 Mem | 181742 | ||
| Antutu 10 UX | 307526 | ||
| Antutu 9 Total | 986456 | ||
| Antutu 8 Total | 661059 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Single Core | 1179 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 3377 | ||
| GeekBench 6 OpenCL | 6451 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Vulkan | 6225 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 1266 | 940 | |
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 3938 | 3380 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Single SIM (Nano-SIM)Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Single SIM (Nano-SIM and/or eSIM), Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by), Dual SIM (one Nano-SIM, one eSIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) CDMA 800 -3G - HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 CDMA2000 1x -4G - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) -3G - HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 -5G - 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79, 80, 84 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
|
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A, 5G | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | |
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS. Up to tri-band: GLONASS (3), BDS (3), GALILEO (2), QZSS (2), NavIC | Yes, with dual-band A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | |
| NFC | Yes | Yes | |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, USB On-The-Go, Display Port 1.2 | USB Type-C 3.1, USB On-The-Go | |
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
Music and Audio
| Radio | No | No | |
| Headphone jack | No | No | |
| Others | - 32-bit/384kHz audio | - 32-bit/384kHz audio |
Other features
| Sensors | - Face ID, fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass, color spectrum , Infrared port | - Face ID, fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass, color temperature sensor , Infrared port | |
| Other extras |
- BDS Satellite Message (sending only) - Fast charging 66W -Fast wireless charging 50W -Reverse wireless charging 5W - IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 6m for 30 mins) |
- Fast charging 66W -Fast wireless charging 50W -Reverse wireless charging 5W - IP68 dust/water resistant |
Reviews and Opinions on Huawei Mate 50 Pro and Huawei Mate 40 Pro
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!