Landvo L900 vs Samsung Galaxy S5 G9009D Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Landvo L900
Smartphone 2
Samsung Galaxy S5 G9009D
Smartphone 3
Landvo L900 or Samsung Galaxy S5 G9009D Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Landvo L900 | Samsung Galaxy S5 G9009D | |
| Rating | (+) | (+) | |
| Release date | May, 2014 | 2014, June | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 142.0 x 73.0 x 8.4 mm | 5.59 x 5.59 x 2.87 in | 142 x 72.5 x 8.1 mm | 5.59 x 5.59 x 2.85 in | |
| Weight | 154 g | 5.43 oz | 145 g | 5.11 oz | |
| Body Build | Plastic | ||
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Black, White | Charcoal Black, Shimmery White, Electric Blue and Copper Gold | |
| Battery | 1900 mAh, Li-Ion, Removable | 2800 mAh, Removable Li-Ion | |
| Battery life |
Talking time - Up to 21 h (3G) Music play - Up to 67 h |
||
| Approximate price | 420 EUR | ||
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | LCD IPS | Super AMOLED | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
| Screen size | 5" in | 5.1" in | |
| Screen area | 71.7 cm2 | ||
| Screen format | 16:9 (height:width) | 16:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 66% | 69.6% | |
| Screen resolution | 540 x 960 px | 1080 x 1920 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 220 PPI | 432 PPI | |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | ||
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 4 MP, Single | 16 MP, Single | |
| Camera specs | -4,9 MP, ƒ/ 2.0, (wide) | -16 MP, f/2.2, 31mm (standard), 1/2.6'', 1.12µm, PDAF | |
| Functions | LED flash | LED flash, panorama, HDR | |
| Video | 1080p video | 2160p@30fps, 1080p@60fps, HDR, dual-video rec. | |
| Front camera, selfie | 1 MP, Single | 2 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 1,9 MP, ƒ/ | 2 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) | |
| Functions | Dual video call | ||
| Video | 1080p@30fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 4.1 Jelly Bean | Android 4.4.2 (KitKat); TouchWiz UI | |
| Chipset | - MediaTek MT6582M (28 nm) | - Qualcomm MSM8974AC Snapdragon 801 (28 nm) | |
| CPU | - Quad-Core (4x Cortex A7 1.3 GHz) | - Quad-core 2.5 GHz Krait 400 | |
| GPU | ARM Mali-400 MP2 | Adreno 330 | |
| External memory | microSD, up to 256 GB (dedicated slot) | ||
| Internal memory | 1GB 4GB, 1GB · 4GB | 16 GB, 2 GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 7 Total | |||
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 139 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 373 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Dual SIM, dual stand-by (Mini SIM + Micro SIM) | Dual SIM (Micro-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | 2G / 3G / | GSM / HSPA / LTE | |
| Bands | -2G - B2 (1900), B3 (1800), B5 (850), B8 (900) -3G - B1 (2100), B5 (850) |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE band 1(2100), 2(1900), 3(1800), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 20(800) |
|
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | ||
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | 802.11b, 802.11g, 802.11n,Wi-Fi Hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | |
| GPS | Yes | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS | |
| NFC | No | Yes | |
| USB | Yes | microUSB 3.0 (MHL 2.1 TV-out), USB Host | |
| Bluetooth | , | 4.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX | |
| Harmful irradiation |
SAR - 1.15 W/kg (head) 1.50 W/kg (body) SAR EU - 0.73 W/kg (head) 0.28 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
| Radio | Yes | No | |
| Headphone jack | Yes | Yes | |
| Others | - 24-bit/192kHz audio -Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic |
Other features
| Sensors | - Proximity, Accelerometer | - Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, gesture, heart rate , Infrared port | |
| Other extras |
- ANT+ -S-Voice natural language commands and dictation -Air gestures - Qi wireless charging (market dependent) - - - - IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 mins) |
||
| Versions |
- Also known as Samsung Galaxy S5 Duos G900FD, Samsung Galaxy S5 Duos LTE |
Reviews and Opinions on Landvo L900 and Samsung Galaxy S5 G9009D
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!