Meizu 16Xs vs Meizu 16X Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1

Meizu 16Xs
Smartphone 2

Meizu 16X
Smartphone 3
Meizu 16Xs or Meizu 16X Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
Brand and model | Meizu 16Xs | Meizu 16X | |
Rating | 0) | (+0) | (+|
Release date | 2019, May | 2018, September | |
Dimensions (HxWxD) | 152 x 74.4 x 8.3 mm | 5.98 x 5.98 x 2.93 in | 151 x 73.5 x 7.5 mm | 5.94 x 5.94 x 2.89 in | |
Weight | 165 g | 5.82 oz | 154 g | 5.43 oz | |
Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
Colors | Carbon Black, Pearl White, Phantom Blue | Black, White, Gold | |
Battery | 4000 mAh, Non-removable Li-Po | 3100 mAh, Non-removable Li-Ion | |
Approximate price | 220 EUR | 300 EUR | |
Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
Technology | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED | |
Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
Screen size | 6.2" in | 6" in | |
Screen area | 95.8 cm2 | 92.9 cm2 | |
Screen format | 18.5:9 (height:width) | 18:9 (height:width) | |
Screen to body ratio | 84.7% | 83.7% | |
Screen resolution | 1080 x 2232 px | 1080 x 2160 px | |
Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 403 PPI | 402 PPI | |
Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
Rear camera, main | 48 MP, Triple | 12 MP, Dual | |
Camera specs | -48 MP, f/1.7, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/2'', 0.8µm, PDAF -8 MP, f/2.2 -5 MP, f/1.9, depth sensor |
-12 MP, f/1.8, 1/2.3'', 1.55µm, 4-axis OIS, dual pixel PDAF & laser AF -20 MP, f/2.6, 1/2.6'', 1.0µm, AF |
|
Functions | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Six-LED dual-tone flash, Auto-HDR, panorama | |
Video | 2160p@30fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) | 2160p@30fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) | |
Front camera, selfie | 16 MP, Single | 20 MP, Single | |
Specifications | 16 MP, f/2.2 | 20 MP, f/2.0 | |
Functions | HDR | ||
Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
Performance
Operating system - OS | Android 9.0 (Pie); Flyme | Android 8.0 (Oreo); Flyme UI | |
Chipset | - Qualcomm SDM675 Snapdragon 675 (11 nm) | - Qualcomm SDM710 Snapdragon 710 (10 nm) | |
CPU | - Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver) | - Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz 360 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 360 Silver) | |
GPU | Adreno 612 | Adreno 616 | |
External memory | No | No | |
Internal memory | 64/128 GB, 6 GB RAM | 64/128 GB, 6 GB RAM |
Benchmark
Antutu 8 Total | 211327 | ||
Antutu 7 Total | |||
GeekBench 4 Single Core | 1911 | 1793 | |
GeekBench 4 Multi-Core | 6863 | 5384 |
Communication and Connectivity
SIM card | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
Network | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | |
Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 -4G - LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 8(900), 34(2000), 38(2600), 39(1900), 40(2300), 41(2500) |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA - China -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - China -4G - LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 8(900), 34(2000), 38(2600), 39(1900), 40(2300), 41(2500) - China |
|
Speed | HSPA, LTE-A | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A Cat15 800/150 Mbps | |
GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
Edge | Yes | Yes | |
Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, WiFi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 а/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, WiFi Direct, hotspot | |
GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS | |
NFC | |||
USB | 2.0, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector | 2.0, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector | |
Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
Music and Audio
Radio | No | No | |
Headphone jack | Yes | Yes | |
Others | - Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic | - Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic |
Other features
Sensors | - Fingerprint (under display), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | - Fingerprint (under display), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | |
Other extras |
- Fast battery charging 24W mCharge |
||
Versions |
- Also known as Meizu 16 in India |
Reviews and Opinions on Meizu 16Xs and Meizu 16X
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!