Motorola Moto E13 vs Motorola Moto E22 Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Motorola Moto E13
Smartphone 2
Motorola Moto E22
Smartphone 3
Differences between Motorola Moto E13 and Motorola Moto E22 - Which to Choose?
Reasons to Consider the Motorola Moto E13:
- Battery Capacity: The Moto E13 boasts a 5000 mAh battery, offering potentially longer battery life compared to the Moto E22's 4020 mAh battery.
- Operating System: It comes with Android 13 (Go edition), which is a newer version compared to the Android 12 on the Moto E22. This might ensure better software support and updates.
- Memory Options: Offers variants with up to 64GB storage and 4GB RAM, providing more space and potentially better multitasking capabilities.
- GPU Performance: Equipped with the Mali-G57 MP1 GPU, it may offer slightly better graphics performance.
- Antutu Benchmark: The Moto E13 has a higher Antutu benchmark score (175987), indicating potentially better overall performance.
- Color Variants: Available in Cosmic Black, Creamy White, Aurora Green, providing more color options.
- Fast Charging: Supports 10W fast charging, beneficial for quicker battery top-ups.
Reasons to Consider the Motorola Moto E22:
- Lighter Weight: Weighs 169g, making it slightly lighter than the Moto E13 at 179.5g, which could be more comfortable for extended use.
- Chipset: Powered by the Mediatek Helio G37, which might offer balanced performance for everyday tasks.
- Camera Setup: Features a dual-camera system (16 MP + 2 MP depth sensor) compared to the single 13 MP camera on the E13. This could mean better photo versatility.
- Screen Refresh Rate: Comes with a 90Hz display, providing smoother visuals compared to the standard 60Hz on the Moto E13.
- NFC Capability: Includes NFC, which is absent in the Moto E13, useful for contactless payments and connectivity.
- Stereo Speakers: Equipped with stereo speakers for potentially better sound quality.
- Price: Priced at 140 EUR, it may offer a more budget-friendly option compared to the E13's $300 price tag.
- Color Choices: Available in Astro Black and Crystal Blue, offering distinct aesthetic options.
Conclusion:
Moto E13 is a good choice for those prioritizing newer software, larger battery capacity, and higher storage options.
Moto E22 stands out for its lighter build, dual-camera setup, smoother screen refresh rate, NFC support, and stereo speakers, making it a suitable choice for users looking for these specific features within a budget-friendly range.
Each phone has its strengths, and the best choice depends on individual preferences and priorities.
Motorola Moto E13 or Motorola Moto E22 Specs Comparison
Common specs
| Brand and model | Motorola Moto E13 | Motorola Moto E22 | |
| Rating | (+11) | (+3) | |
| Release date | 2023, January 24 | 2022, September 16 | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 164.2 x 75 x 8.5 mm | 6.46 x 6.46 x 2.95 in | 163.6 x 74.7 x 8 mm | 6.44 x 6.44 x 2.94 in | |
| Weight | 179.5 g | 6.33 oz | 169 g | 5.96 oz | |
| Body Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | |
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Cosmic Black, Creamy White, Aurora Green | Astro Black, Crystal Blue | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | 4020 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | |
| Approximate price | $ 300 | 140 EUR | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | IPS LCD | IPS LCD | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
| Screen size | 6.5" in | 6.5" in | |
| Screen area | 102.0 cm2 | 102.0 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 20:9 (height:width) | 20:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 82.8% | 83.5% | |
| Screen resolution | 720 x 1600 px | 720 x 1600 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 270 PPI | 270 PPI | |
| Other specs | - 90Hz | ||
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 13 MP, Single | 16 MP, Dual | |
| Camera specs | -13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.12µm, PDAF | -16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm, PDAF -2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
|
| Functions | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama | |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps | |
| Front camera, selfie | 5 MP, Single | 5 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 5 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/5'', 1.12µm | 5 MP, f/2.4, 1/5", 1.12µm | |
| Functions | HDR | ||
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 13 (Go edition) | Android 12 | |
| Chipset | - Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | - Mediatek MT6765V/CB Helio G37 (12 nm) | |
| CPU | - Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | - Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | PowerVR GE8320 | |
| External memory | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated) | |
| Internal memory | 64GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 9 Total | 175987 | 135000 | |
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 314 | 241 | |
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 1247 | 1559 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 -4G - 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE |
|
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, hotspot | |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | |
| NFC | No | Yes | |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 | |
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
Music and Audio
| Radio | FM radio, recording | FM radio | |
| Headphone jack | Yes | Yes | |
| Others |
Other features
| Sensors | - Accelerometer, proximity | - Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | |
| Other extras |
- Fast charging 10W - Water-resistant design |
- Water-repellent coating |
