Motorola Moto G5 vs Motorola ATRIX TV XT687 Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Motorola Moto G5
Smartphone 2
Motorola ATRIX TV XT687
Smartphone 3
Motorola Moto G5 or Motorola ATRIX TV XT687 Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Motorola Moto G5 | Motorola ATRIX TV XT687 | |
| Rating | (+0) | (+0) | |
| Release date | 2017, February | 2012, May | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 144.3 x 73 x 9.5 mm | 5.68 x 5.68 x 2.87 in | 119.8 x 60.5 x 9.9 mm | 4.72 x 4.72 x 2.38 in | |
| Weight | 145 g | 5.11 oz | 129.7 g | 4.58 oz | |
| Body Build | Front glass, aluminum back, plastic ends | ||
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Lunar Grey, Fine Gold, Sapphire Blue | Dark Grey | |
| Battery | 2800 mAh, Removable Li-Ion | 0 mAh, | |
| Battery life |
Stand by time - Up to 500 h (2G) / Up to 400 h (3G) Talking time - Up to 10 h (2G) / Up to 6 h (3G) |
||
| Approximate price | 150 EUR | 210 EUR | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | IPS LCD | TFT | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | ||
| Screen size | 5" in | 4" in | |
| Screen area | 68.9 cm2 | 44.1 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 16:9 (height:width) | 16:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 65.4% | 60.8% | |
| Screen resolution | 1080 x 1920 px | 480 x 854 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 441 PPI | 245 PPI | |
| Screen protection | Scratch-resistant glass | ||
| Other specs | - Touch sensitive controls | ||
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 13 MP, Single | 8 MP, Single | |
| Camera specs | -13 MP, PDAF, f/2.0 | -8 MP, AF | |
| Functions | LED flash, panorama | LED flash | |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | Yes | |
| Front camera, selfie | 5 MP, Single | 0.3 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 5 MP, f/2.2 | VGA |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 7.0 (Nougat), upgradable to Android 8.1 (Oreo) | Android 4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich) | |
| Chipset | - Qualcomm MSM8937 Snapdragon 430 (28 nm) | - Qualcomm MSM7227A-AA Snapdragon S1 | |
| CPU | - Octa-core 1.4 GHz Cortex-A53 | - 1.0 GHz Cortex-A5 | |
| GPU | Adreno 505 | Adreno 200 | |
| External memory | microSD, up to 256 GB | microSD, up to 32 GB (dedicated slot), 2 GB included | |
| Internal memory | 16/32 GB, 2/3 GB RAM | 512 MB, 512 MB RAM |
Benchmark
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 104 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 374 | ||
| GeekBench 4 Single Core | 617 | ||
| GeekBench 4 Multi-Core | 2476 | ||
| GeekBench 4 RenderScript | 1956 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Single SIM (Nano-SIM)Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Dual SIM (Mini-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 19(800), 20(800), 28(700), 38(2600), 40(2300) |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
|
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 7.2/5.76 Mbps | |
| GPRS | Yes | Class 12 | |
| Edge | Yes | Class 12 | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, WiFi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot | |
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS | Yes, with A-GPS | |
| NFC | |||
| USB | microUSB 2.0, USB Host | microUSB 2.0 | |
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE, EDR, aptX | 3.0, A2DP, EDR |
Music and Audio
| Radio | FM radio | Stereo FM radio, RDS | |
| Headphone jack | Yes | Yes | |
| Others | - Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | - Accelerometer, proximity, compass | |
| Other extras |
- Fast battery charging |
- Mobile TV -MP3/WAV/WMA/AAC+ player -Divx/MP4/WMV/H.264 player -Document viewer -Photo viewer/editor -Organizer -Voice memo/dial -Predictive text input |
|
| Versions |
- Also known as Motorola XT687 Dual Chip |
Reviews and Opinions on Motorola Moto G5 and Motorola ATRIX TV XT687
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!