Motorola Moto G8 Power vs Samsung Galaxy Core Lite LTE Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Smartphone 2
Samsung Galaxy Core Lite LTE
Smartphone 3
Motorola Moto G8 Power or Samsung Galaxy Core Lite LTE Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Motorola Moto G8 Power | Samsung Galaxy Core Lite LTE | |
| Rating | (+0) | (+0) | |
| Release date | 2020, February 7 | 2014, June | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 156 x 75.8 x 9.6 mm | 6.14 x 6.14 x 2.98 in | 133.1 x 70 x 9.9 mm | 5.24 x 5.24 x 2.76 in | |
| Weight | 197 g | 6.95 oz | 149 g | 5.26 oz | |
| Body Build | Glass front, plastic back, aluminum frame (6000 series) | ||
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Smoke Black, Capri Blue | White | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh, Non-removable Li-Po | 2000 mAh, Removable Li-Ion | |
| Approximate price | 230 EUR | 210 EUR | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | IPS LCD | TFT | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
| Screen size | 6.4" in | 4.7" in | |
| Screen area | 100.7 cm2 | 62.9 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 5:3 (height:width) | ||
| Screen to body ratio | 85.1% | 67.5% | |
| Screen resolution | 1080 x 2300 px | 480 x 800 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 0 PPI | 199 PPI | |
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 16 MP, Quad | 5 MP, Single | |
| Camera specs | -16 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.8'', 1.12µm, PDAF -8 MP, f/2.2, (telephoto), 1/4.0'', 1.12µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom -8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0'', 1.12µm -2 MP, f/2.2, (macro), 1/5.0'', 1.75µm |
-5 MP, AF | |
| Functions | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash | |
| Video | 2160p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) | 720p@30fps | |
| Front camera, selfie | 16 MP, Single | 0 MP, | |
| Specifications | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.0'', 1.0µm | ||
| Functions | HDR | ||
| Video | 1080p@30fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 10.0 | Android 4.3 (Jelly Bean) | |
| Chipset | - Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) | ||
| CPU | - Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | - Quad-core 1.2 GHz | |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | ||
| External memory | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSD, up to 64 GB (dedicated slot) | |
| Internal memory | 64GB 4GB RAM | 8 GB, 1 GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 8 Total | 168974 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 368 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 1364 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Micro-SIM | |
| Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE band 1(2100), 2(1900), 3(1800), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 12(700), 17(700), 28(700), 66(1700/2100) |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 -3G - HSDPA 900 / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 8(900), 28(700) |
|
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A (2CA) Cat13 600/100 Mbps | HSPA, LTE Cat3 100/50 Mbps | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | |
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS | |
| NFC | Yes | ||
| USB | 2.0, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector | microUSB 2.0 | |
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 4.0, A2DP | |
| Harmful irradiation |
SAR - 1.28 W/kg (head) 0.88 W/kg (body) SAR EU - 0.25 W/kg (head) 0.26 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
| Radio | FM radio | No | |
| Headphone jack | Yes | Yes | |
| Others |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | - Accelerometer, proximity | |
| Other extras |
- Fast battery charging 15W - Splash resistant |
||
| Versions |
- Also known as: Samsung Galaxy Core Lite 4G, Samsung G3586V |
Reviews and Opinions on Motorola Moto G8 Power and Samsung Galaxy Core Lite LTE
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!