Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite vs Samsung Galaxy A20e Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
Smartphone 2
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Smartphone 3
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite or Samsung Galaxy A20e Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
Brand and model | Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite | Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
Rating | (+) | (+) | |
Release date | 2020, April 3 | 2019, April | |
Dimensions (HxWxD) | 164.9 x 75.8 x 9.2 mm | 6.49 x 6.49 x 2.98 in | 147.4 x 69.7 x 8.4 mm | 5.8 x 5.8 x 2.74 in | |
Weight | 200 g | 7.05 oz | 141 g | 4.97 oz | |
Body Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Front glass, plastic body | |
Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
Colors | Arctic Blue, Royal Blue | Black, White, Blue, Coral | |
Battery | 5000 mAh, Non-removable Li-Po | 3000 mAh, Non-removable Li-Po | |
Approximate price | € 169.9 | 180 EUR | |
Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
Technology | IPS LCD | PLS TFT | |
Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
Screen size | 6.5" in | 5.8" in | |
Screen area | 102.8 cm2 | 82.6 cm2 | |
Screen format | 20:9 (height:width) | 19.5:9 (height:width) | |
Screen to body ratio | 82.2% | 80.4% | |
Screen resolution | 720 x 1600 px | 720 x 1560 px | |
Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 269 PPI | 296 PPI | |
Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
Rear camera, main | 16 MP, Triple | 13 MP, Dual | |
Camera specs | -16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.0µm, PDAF -2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) -2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
-13 MP, f/1.9, 28mm (wide), AF -5 MP, f/2.2, 12mm (ultrawide) |
|
Functions | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR | |
Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps | |
Front camera, selfie | 8 MP, Single | 8 MP, Single | |
Specifications | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.0 | |
Functions | HDR | ||
Video | 1080p@30fps |
Performance
Operating system - OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 9.0 (Pie); One UI | |
Chipset | - Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12nm) | - Exynos 7884 Octa (14 nm) | |
CPU | - Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | - Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A73 & 6x1.35 GHz Cortex-A53) | |
GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G71 MP2 | |
External memory | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSD, up to 1 TB (dedicated slot) | |
Internal memory | 64GB 4GB RAM | 32 GB, 3 GB RAM |
Benchmark
Antutu 8 Total | 103947 | ||
Antutu 7 Total | |||
GeekBench 6 Single Core | 241 | ||
GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 752 | ||
GeekBench 5 Single Core | 237 | ||
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 863 |
Communication and Connectivity
SIM card | Single SIM (Nano-SIM)Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Single SIM (Nano-SIM)Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE | |
Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM only) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE |
|
Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | |
GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
Edge | Yes | Yes | |
Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | |
GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, LTEPP, SUPL | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | |
NFC | Yes | ||
USB | microUSB 2.0 | 2.0, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector | |
Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE | |
Harmful irradiation | SAR - 0.50 W/kg (head) 1.30 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
Radio | FM radio | FM radio | |
Headphone jack | Yes | Yes | |
Others | - Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic |
Other features
Sensors | - Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | - Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | |
Other extras |
- Normal charging 10W - Splash resistant |
- Fast battery charging 15W |
|
Versions |
- Versions: SM-A202F/DS (Global) |
Reviews and Opinions on Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite and Samsung Galaxy A20e
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!