Motorola Moto G84 vs Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Motorola Moto G84
Smartphone 2
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Smartphone 3
Differences between Motorola Moto G84 and Samsung Galaxy A34 5G - Which to Choose?
Reasons to consider the Motorola Moto G84:
- Higher Antutu score (376632 vs. 556613) which may reflect better overall performance.
- Equipped with a P-OLED display, which usually offers better contrast and battery efficiency compared to Samsung Galaxy A34’s Super AMOLED.
- Supports up to 256GB internal storage with 12GB RAM option, providing more space and potentially better multitasking capabilities.
- Slightly slimmer design at 7.6mm, which could be more appealing for users looking for a thinner device.
- Available with eco leather back option, providing a unique material choice.
- IP54 rating signifies a degree of dust and splash resistance.
- Features a 3.5mm headphone jack, which is absent on the Samsung Galaxy A34 5G.
- Includes FM radio (depending on the market/region).
- Has an under-display optical fingerprint sensor for security.
- Higher resolution selfie camera at 16 MP.
- More affordable pricing at 230 EUR.
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A34 5G:
- Higher overall Antutu version 10 score (556613 vs. 376632) suggesting potential for stronger performance.
- Larger screen at 6.6 inches, which may offer a better experience for media consumption and gaming.
- Higher screen resolution (1080 x 2340 pixels) which may result in slightly sharper images and text.
- Corning Gorilla Glass 5 screen protection to prevent scratches and damage.
- More advanced Bluetooth version 5.3 which may provide better connectivity and features.
- Equipped with a triple camera setup, offering a macro lens in addition to wide and ultrawide lenses.
- Capable of recording 4K video with both the rear and selfie cameras.
- IP67 dust/water resistance is better compared to Motorola's IP54 rating, offering complete dust proofing and greater water resistance.
- Features GPS technology with BDS support, in addition to GPS, GLONASS, and GALILEO.
- Higher weight (199g) which might translate to a more solid and robust feel.
Both smartphones come with their own set of advantages. The Motorola Moto G84 offers exceptional specifications for a lower price, while the Samsung Galaxy A34 5G has a marginally better performance score, superior camera capabilities, and higher durability. Ultimately, the decision might come down to brand preference, desired features, and budget.
Motorola Moto G84 or Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Motorola Moto G84 | Samsung Galaxy A34 5G | |
| Rating | (+5) | (+1) | |
| Release date | 2023, August 24 | 2023, March 14 | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 160 x 74.4 x 7.6 mm | 6.3 x 6.3 x 2.93 in | 161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2 mm | 6.35 x 6.35 x 3.07 in | |
| Weight | 166.8 g | 5.88 oz | 199 g | 7.02 oz | |
| Body Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back or eco leather back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back | |
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue, Viva Magenta | Lime, Graphite, Violet, Silver | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | 5000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | |
| Approximate price | € 234.7 | 389 EUR | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | P-OLED | Super AMOLED | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 1B | 16M | |
| Screen size | 6.5" in | 6.6" in | |
| Screen area | 102.0 cm2 | 106.9 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 20:9 (height:width) | 19.5:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 85.7% | 84.9% | |
| Screen resolution | 1080 x 2400 px | 1080 x 2340 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 405 PPI | 390 PPI | |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | ||
| Other specs | - 120Hz, 1300 nits (peak) - |
- 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | |
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 50 MP, Dual | 48 MP, Triple | |
| Camera specs | -50 MP, f/1.9 (wide), 1/1.5", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS -8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF |
-48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0'', 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS -8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0'', 1.12µm -5 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
|
| Functions | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR | |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps | |
| DxOMark Main Score | 92 | ||
| DxOMark Photo | 99 | ||
| DxOMark Video | 78 | ||
| Front camera, selfie | 16 MP, Single | 13 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1.0µm | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1'', 1.12µm | |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 13, planned upgrade to Android 14 | Android 13, One UI 5.1 | |
| Chipset | - Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | - Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) | |
| CPU | - Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | - Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 MC4 | |
| External memory | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | |
| Internal memory | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 10 Total | 376632 | 556613 | |
| Antutu 10 CPU | 172806 | ||
| Antutu 10 GPU | 116205 | ||
| Antutu 10 Mem | 115870 | ||
| Antutu 10 UX | 172806 | ||
| Antutu 9 Total | 388015 | 473852 | |
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 1824 | 780 | |
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 2341 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Single SIM (Nano-SIM)Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - LATAM HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - International -4G - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 - LATAM 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42 - International -5G - 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 26, 28, 40, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - LATAM 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE -5G - SA/NSA/Sub6 |
|
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) | |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | |
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE | |
| Harmful irradiation |
SAR EU - 0.55 W/kg (head) 1.49 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
| Radio | FM radio (market/region dependent) | No | |
| Headphone jack | Yes | No | |
| Others | - 24-bit/192kHz Hi-Res audio |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity | |
| Other extras |
- Smart Connect (Ready For) support - 30W Fast charging - IP54, dust and splash resistant |
- Fast charging 25W - IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 mins) |
Reviews and Opinions on Motorola Moto G84 and Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!