Motorola Moto G84 vs Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Comparison and Differences

Smartphone 1

Motorola Moto G84

Motorola Moto G84

Smartphone 2

Samsung Galaxy A34 5G

Samsung Galaxy A34 5G

Smartphone 3

Differences between Motorola Moto G84 and Samsung Galaxy A34 5G - Which to Choose?

Reasons to consider the Motorola Moto G84:

  • Higher Antutu score (376632 vs. 556613) which may reflect better overall performance.
  • Equipped with a P-OLED display, which usually offers better contrast and battery efficiency compared to Samsung Galaxy A34’s Super AMOLED.
  • Supports up to 256GB internal storage with 12GB RAM option, providing more space and potentially better multitasking capabilities.
  • Slightly slimmer design at 7.6mm, which could be more appealing for users looking for a thinner device.
  • Available with eco leather back option, providing a unique material choice.
  • IP54 rating signifies a degree of dust and splash resistance.
  • Features a 3.5mm headphone jack, which is absent on the Samsung Galaxy A34 5G.
  • Includes FM radio (depending on the market/region).
  • Has an under-display optical fingerprint sensor for security.
  • Higher resolution selfie camera at 16 MP.
  • More affordable pricing at 230 EUR.

Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A34 5G:

  • Higher overall Antutu version 10 score (556613 vs. 376632) suggesting potential for stronger performance.
  • Larger screen at 6.6 inches, which may offer a better experience for media consumption and gaming.
  • Higher screen resolution (1080 x 2340 pixels) which may result in slightly sharper images and text.
  • Corning Gorilla Glass 5 screen protection to prevent scratches and damage.
  • More advanced Bluetooth version 5.3 which may provide better connectivity and features.
  • Equipped with a triple camera setup, offering a macro lens in addition to wide and ultrawide lenses.
  • Capable of recording 4K video with both the rear and selfie cameras.
  • IP67 dust/water resistance is better compared to Motorola's IP54 rating, offering complete dust proofing and greater water resistance.
  • Features GPS technology with BDS support, in addition to GPS, GLONASS, and GALILEO.
  • Higher weight (199g) which might translate to a more solid and robust feel.

Both smartphones come with their own set of advantages. The Motorola Moto G84 offers exceptional specifications for a lower price, while the Samsung Galaxy A34 5G has a marginally better performance score, superior camera capabilities, and higher durability. Ultimately, the decision might come down to brand preference, desired features, and budget.


Motorola Moto G84 or Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Specs Comparison

or

Common specs

Brand and model Motorola Moto G84 Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Rating (+5) (+1)
Release date 2023, August 24 2023, March 14
Dimensions (HxWxD) 160 x 74.4 x 7.6 mm | 6.3 x 6.3 x 2.93 in 161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2 mm | 6.35 x 6.35 x 3.07 in
Weight 166.8 g | 5.88 oz 199 g | 7.02 oz
Body Build Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back or eco leather back Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back
Case buy from Amazon

buy from Amazon

Colors Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue, Viva Magenta Lime, Graphite, Violet, Silver
Battery 5000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable 5000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable
Approximate price € 234.7 389 EUR
Check price from Amazon

from Amazon

Screen

Technology P-OLED Super AMOLED
Touchscreen capacitive touchscreen capacitive touchscreen
Display colors 1B 16M
Screen size 6.5" in 6.6" in
Screen area 102.0 cm2 106.9 cm2
Screen format 20:9 (height:width) 19.5:9 (height:width)
Screen to body ratio 85.7% 84.9%
Screen resolution 1080 x 2400 px 1080 x 2340 px
Screen PPI /points per inch/ 405 PPI 390 PPI
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Other specs - 120Hz, 1300 nits (peak)
-
- 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM)
Screen protector buy from Amazon buy from Amazon

Camera and Video

Rear camera, main 50 MP, Dual 48 MP, Triple
Camera specs -50 MP, f/1.9 (wide), 1/1.5", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
-8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF
-48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0'', 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
-8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0'', 1.12µm
-5 MP, f/2.4, (macro)
Functions LED flash, HDR, panorama LED flash, panorama, HDR
Video 1080p@30/60fps 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps
DxOMark Main Score 92
DxOMark Photo 99
DxOMark Video 78
Front camera, selfie 16 MP, Single 13 MP, Single
Specifications 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1.0µm 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1'', 1.12µm
Video 1080p@30fps 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps

Performance

Operating system - OS Android 13, planned upgrade to Android 14 Android 13, One UI 5.1
Chipset - Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) - Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm)
CPU - Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) - Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 619 Mali-G68 MC4
External memory microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal memory 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM

Benchmark

Antutu 10 Total 376632 556613
Antutu 10 CPU 172806
Antutu 10 GPU 116205
Antutu 10 Mem 115870
Antutu 10 UX 172806
Antutu 9 Total 388015 473852
GeekBench 5 Single Core 1824 780
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core 2341

Communication and Connectivity

SIM card Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) Single SIM (Nano-SIM)Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by)
Network GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
Bands -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2
-3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - LATAM
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - International
-4G - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 - LATAM
1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42 - International
-5G - 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 26, 28, 40, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - LATAM
1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only)
-3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
-4G - LTE
-5G - SA/NSA/Sub6
Speed HSPA, LTE, 5G HSPA, LTE-A, 5G
GPRS Yes Yes
Edge Yes Yes
Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
GPS GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
NFC Yes (market/region dependent) Yes (market/region dependent)
USB USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
Bluetooth 5.1, A2DP, LE 5.3, A2DP, LE
Harmful irradiation
SAR EU - 0.55 W/kg (head) 1.49 W/kg (body)

Music and Audio

Radio FM radio (market/region dependent) No
Headphone jack Yes No
Others - 24-bit/192kHz Hi-Res audio

Other features

Sensors - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity
Other extras
- Smart Connect (Ready For) support
- 30W Fast charging
- IP54, dust and splash resistant

- Fast charging 25W
- IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 mins)

Reviews and Opinions on Motorola Moto G84 and Samsung Galaxy A34 5G

If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!

There are no comments yet. Be the first to comment.