Motorola Moto G9 Plus vs Motorola Moto G9 Power Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Smartphone 2
Motorola Moto G9 Power
Smartphone 3
Motorola Moto G9 Plus or Motorola Moto G9 Power Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
Brand and model | Motorola Moto G9 Plus | Motorola Moto G9 Power | |
Rating | (+) | (+) | |
Release date | 2020, September 07 | 2020, November 05 | |
Dimensions (HxWxD) | 170 x 78.1 x 9.7 mm | 6.69 x 6.69 x 3.07 in | 172.1 x 76.8 x 9.7 mm | 6.78 x 6.78 x 3.02 in | |
Weight | 223 g | 7.87 oz | 221 g | 7.8 oz | |
Body Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | ||
Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
Colors | Rose Gold, Indigo Blue | Electric Violet, Metallic Sage | |
Battery | 5000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | 6000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | |
Approximate price | 250 EUR | 200 EUR | |
Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
Technology | LTPS IPS LCD | IPS LCD | |
Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
Screen size | 6.81" in | 6.8" in | |
Screen area | 112.0 cm2 | 109.8 cm2 | |
Screen format | 20:9 (height:width) | ||
Screen to body ratio | 84.3% | 83.1% | |
Screen resolution | 1080 x 2400 px | 720 x 1640 px | |
Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 386 PPI | 0 PPI | |
Other specs | - HDR10 | ||
Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
Rear camera, main | 64 MP, Quad | 64 MP, Triple | |
Camera specs | -64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF -8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm -2 MP, f/2.2, (macro) -2 MP, f/2.2, (depth) |
-64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF -2 MP, f/2.4, (macro), AF -2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
|
Functions | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama | |
Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps | |
Front camera, selfie | 16 MP, Single | 16 MP, Single | |
Specifications | 16MP, f/2.0, 29mm (standard) | 16 MP, f/2.2, 1.0µm | |
Functions | HDR | HDR | |
Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
Performance
Operating system - OS | Android 10 | Android 10 | |
Chipset | - Qualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730G (8 nm) | - Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) | |
CPU | - Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) | - Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | |
GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 610 | |
External memory | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | |
Internal memory | 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM |
Benchmark
Antutu 9 Total | 292432 | 201099 | |
GeekBench 5 Single Core | 589 | 352 | |
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 1600 | 1300 |
Communication and Connectivity
SIM card | Single SIM (Nano-SIM)Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Single SIM (Nano-SIM)Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE | |
Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
|
Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A | |
GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
Edge | Yes | Yes | |
Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | |
GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, LTEEP, SUPL | |
NFC | Yes | Yes | |
USB | 2.0, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector | USB Type-C 2.0 | |
Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
Music and Audio
Radio | FM radio | FM radio | |
Headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
Other features
Sensors | - Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | - Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | |
Other extras |
- Fast charging 30W |
- Fast charging 20W - Water-repellent coating |
Reviews and Opinions on Motorola Moto G9 Plus and Motorola Moto G9 Power
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!