Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Xiaomi Poco X4 GT Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Smartphone 2
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Smartphone 3
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or Xiaomi Poco X4 GT Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | Xiaomi Poco X4 GT | |
| Rating | (+0) | (+0) | |
| Release date | 2023, June 01 | 2022, June 23 | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 170.8 x 74 x 7 mm | 6.72 x 6.72 x 2.91 in | 163.6 x 74.3 x 8.9 mm | 6.44 x 6.44 x 2.93 in | |
| Weight | 184.5 g | 6.51 oz | 200 g | 7.05 oz | |
| Body Build | Plastic front (unfolded), glass front (folded, Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame (7000 series), hinge (stainless steel) | Plastic, Glass | |
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Infinite Black, Glacier Blue, Viva Magenta, Peach Fuzz | Black, Blue, Silver | |
| Battery | 3800 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | 5080 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | |
| Approximate price | € 618.2 | 385 EUR | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | IPS LCD | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 1B | 16M | |
| Screen size | 6.9" in | 6.6" in | |
| Screen area | 107.6 cm2 | 103.4 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 20:9 (height:width) | ||
| Screen to body ratio | 85.1% | 85.1% | |
| Screen resolution | 1080 x 2640 px | 1080 x 2460 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 413 PPI | 407 PPI | |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | ||
| Other specs | - 165Hz, HDR10+, 1400 nits (peak) -Second external AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1100 nits (peak) -3.6 inches, 1056 x 1066 pixels, 413 ppi, Gorilla Glass Victus |
- 144Hz -HDR10 -Dolby Vision -500 nits (typ) -650 nits (HBM) |
|
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 12 MP, Dual | 64 MP, Triple | |
| Camera specs | -12 MP, f/1.5, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, PDAF, OIS -13 MP, f/2.2, 108˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
-64 MP, f/1.9 (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF -8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm -2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
|
| Functions | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama | |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, HDR10+, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | |
| Front camera, selfie | 32 MP, Single | 16 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 0.7µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | |
| Functions | HDR | ||
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO | |
| Chipset | - Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | - MediaTek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm) | |
| CPU | - Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | - Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G610 MC6 | |
| External memory | No | No | |
| Internal memory | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 10 Total | 820061 | ||
| Antutu 10 CPU | 254458 | ||
| Antutu 10 GPU | 200476 | ||
| Antutu 10 Mem | 171242 | ||
| Antutu 10 UX | 254458 | ||
| Antutu 9 Total | 957693 | 824562 | |
| GeekBench 6 Single Core | 1074 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 3365 | ||
| GeekBench 6 OpenCL | 3756 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Vulkan | 4012 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 1305 | 994 | |
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 4097 | 3752 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Nano-SIM, eSIM or Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 CDMA 800 / 1900 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 CDMA2000 1xEV-DO -4G - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 - International 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, , 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 - North America -5G - 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International 2, 5, 7, 12, 13, 14, 25, 26, 29, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - North America |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - B1 (2100), B2 (1900), B3 (1800), B4 (1700/2100 AWS 1), B5 (850), B7 (2600), B8 (900), B12 (700), B13 (700), B17 (700), B18 (800), B19 (800), B20 (800), B26 (850), B28b (700), B28a (700), B38 (TDD 2600), B40 (TDD 2300), B41 (TDD 2500), B42 (TDD 3500) -5G - n1 (2100), n3 (1800), n5 (850), n7 (2600), n8 (900), n20 (800), n28b (700), n28a (700), n38 (2600), n40 (2300), n41 (2500), n77 (3700), n78 (3500) |
|
| Speed | HSPA, LTE (CA), 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A (CA), 5G | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band or tri-band (region dependent) | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | |
| GPS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) | |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, USB On-The-Go | |
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
Music and Audio
| Radio | No | No | |
| Headphone jack | No | Yes | |
| Others | - Snapdragon Sound | - 24-bit/192kHz audio |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer (USA only) | - Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, color spectrum , Infrared port | |
| Other extras |
- 30W Fast charging -5W Wireless charging - Water-repellent coating |
- Fast charging 67W, 100% in 46 min -USB Power Delivery 3.0 - IP53, dust and splash resistant |
|
| Versions |
- Also known as Motorola razr+ in North America, Motorola Moto Razr 2023 in China; Motorola Razr 4, Motorola Razr4, Motorola Razr gen 4 |
Reviews and Opinions on Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!