Nokia 3.4 vs Motorola Moto E7 Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Nokia 3.4
Smartphone 2
Motorola Moto E7
Smartphone 3
Nokia 3.4 or Motorola Moto E7 Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
Brand and model | Nokia 3.4 | Motorola Moto E7 | |
Rating | (+) | (+) | |
Release date | 2020, September 22 | 2020, November 24 | |
Dimensions (HxWxD) | 161 x 76 x 8.7 mm | 6.34 x 6.34 x 2.99 in | 164.9 x 75.7 x 8.9 mm | 6.49 x 6.49 x 2.98 in | |
Weight | 180 g | 6.35 oz | 180 g | 6.35 oz | |
Body Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | ||
Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
Colors | Fjord, Dusk, Charcoal | Mineral Gray, Aqua Blue, Satin Coral | |
Battery | 4000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | 4000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | |
Approximate price | 160 EUR | $ 110 | |
Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
Technology | IPS LCD | IPS LCD | |
Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
Screen size | 6.39" in | 6.5" in | |
Screen area | 100.2 cm2 | 102.8 cm2 | |
Screen format | 19.5:9 (height:width) | 20:9 (height:width) | |
Screen to body ratio | 81.9% | 82.3% | |
Screen resolution | 720 x 1560 px | 720 x 1600 px | |
Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 269 PPI | 269 PPI | |
Other specs | - 400 nits typ. brightness | ||
Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
Rear camera, main | 13 MP, Triple | 48 MP, Dual | |
Camera specs | -13 MP, (wide), PDAF -5 MP, (ultrawide) -2 MP, (depth) |
-48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0'', 0.8µm, PDAF -2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
|
Functions | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama | |
Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps | |
Front camera, selfie | 8 MP, Single | 5 MP, Single | |
Specifications | 8 MP, (wide) | 5 MP, f/2.2 | |
Functions | HDR | ||
Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
Performance
Operating system - OS | Android 10, planned upgrade to Android 11 | Android 10 | |
Chipset | - Qualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460 (11 nm) | - MediaTek Helio G25 (12 nm) | |
CPU | - Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | - Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) | |
GPU | Adreno 610 | PowerVR GE8320 | |
External memory | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | |
Internal memory | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM |
Benchmark
Antutu 8 Total | 158000 | 102756 | |
GeekBench 6 Single Core | 266 | ||
GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 993 | ||
GeekBench 5 Single Core | 249 | 123 | |
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 1123 | 444 |
Communication and Connectivity
SIM card | Single SIM (Nano-SIM)Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE | |
Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 13, 28, 66 |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - Europe, Asia HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - LATAM -4G - 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 - Europe |
|
Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | |
GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
Edge | Yes | Yes | |
Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot | |
GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, LTEEP, SUPL | |
NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | No | |
USB | USB 2.0, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector | USB Type-C 2.0 | |
Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, aptX | 5.0, A2DP, LE | |
Harmful irradiation |
SAR - 0.83 W/kg (head) 1.05 W/kg (body) SAR EU - 0.36 W/kg (head) 1.56 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
Radio | FM radio | FM radio | |
Headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
Other features
Sensors | - Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | - Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | |
Other extras |
- Charging 10W |
- Charging 10W - Water-repellent coating |
Reviews and Opinions on Nokia 3.4 and Motorola Moto E7
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!