Nokia E72 vs BlackBerry Q10 Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Nokia E72
Smartphone 2
BlackBerry Q10
Smartphone 3
Nokia E72 or BlackBerry Q10 Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Nokia E72 | BlackBerry Q10 | |
| Rating | (+0) | (+0) | |
| Release date | 2009, June | 2013, January | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 114 x 58 x 10 mm | 4.49 x 4.49 x 2.28 in | 119.6 x 66.8 x 10.4 mm | 4.71 x 4.71 x 2.63 in | |
| Weight | 128 g | 4.52 oz | 139 g | 4.9 oz | |
| Body Build | Plastic body | ||
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | White, Zodium Black, Metal Grey, Topaz Brown, Amethyst Purple, White Edition | Black, White | |
| Battery | 1500 mAh, Removable Li-Po | 2100 mAh, Removable Li-Ion | |
| Battery life |
Stand by time - Up to 480 h (2G) / 576 h (3G) Talking time - Up to 12 h 30 min (2G) / 6 h (3G) |
Stand by time - Up to 360 h (3G) Talking time - Up to 10 h (2G) / Up to 13 h 30 min (3G) |
|
| Keyboard | QWERTY | QWERTY | |
| Approximate price | 90 EUR | 110 EUR | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | TFT | Super AMOLED | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | ||
| Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
| Screen size | 2.36" in | 3.1" in | |
| Screen area | 17.2 cm2 | 31.0 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 4:3 (height:width) | 1:1 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 26.1% | 38.8% | |
| Screen resolution | 320 x 240 px | 720 x 720 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 169 PPI | 328 PPI | |
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 5 MP, Single | 8 MP, Single | |
| Camera specs | -5 MP, AF | -8 MP, f/2.2, 31mm (standard), AF | |
| Functions | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama | |
| Video | 480p@15fps | 1080p@30fps | |
| Front camera, selfie | 0.3 MP, Single | 2 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | VGA videocall camera | 2 MP | |
| Video | 720p |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Symbian OS 9.3, Series 60 v3.2 UI | BlackBerry OS 10, upgradable to 10.3.1 | |
| Chipset | - Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 | ||
| CPU | - 600 MHz ARM 11 | - Dual-core 1.5 GHz Krait (LTE version)/ Cortex-A9 (Non-LTE) | |
| GPU | Adreno 225 (LTE version)/ PowerVR SGX544 (Non-LTE) | ||
| External memory | microSD, up to 16 GB (dedicated slot) | microSD, up to 64 GB (dedicated slot) | |
| Internal memory | 250 MB, 128 MB RAM | 16 GB, 2 GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 7 Total |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Mini-SIM | Micro-SIM | |
| Network | GSM / HSPA | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - all versions CDMA 800 / 1900 - SQN100-2, SQN100-4 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 1900 / 2100 - SQN100-1 HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - SQN100-2, SQN100-3, SQN100-4 HSDPA 850 / 1700 / 1900 / 2100 - SQN100-5 -4G - LTE band 2(1900), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 17(700) - SQN100-1, SQN100-5 LTE band 4(1700/2100), 13(700) - SQN100-2 LTE band 3(1800), 7(2600), 8(900), 20(800) - SQN100-3 LTE band 25(1900) - SQN100-4 |
|
| Speed | HSPA 10.2/2 Mbps | EV-DO Rev.A 3.1 Mbps, HSPA, LTE (market dependent) | |
| GPRS | Class 32, 100 kbps | Yes | |
| Edge | Class 32, 296 kbps | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g, Nokia VoIP 3.0 | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual band, hotspot | |
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS; Nokia Maps 3.0 | Yes, with A-GPS | |
| NFC | Yes | ||
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 | |
| Bluetooth | 2.0, A2DP | 4.0, A2DP | |
| Harmful irradiation |
SAR - 1.39 W/kg (head) 0.88 W/kg (body) SAR EU - 1.31 W/kg (head) |
SAR - 1.16 W/kg (head) 0.75 W/kg (body) SAR EU - 1.41 W/kg (head) 0.78 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
| Radio | Stereo FM radio, RDS | FM radio (after SW upgrade) | |
| Headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
Other features
| Sensors | - Accelerometer, compass | - Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | |
| Other extras |
- WMV/RV/MP4/3GP player -MP3/WMA/WAV/RA/AAC/M4A player -Document editor (Word, Excel, PowerPoint, PDF) -Push to talk -Voice command/dial -Organizer --Optical trackpad |
- HDMI port |
Reviews and Opinions on Nokia E72 and BlackBerry Q10
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!