OnePlus 7 Pro vs Google Pixel 3 XL Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
OnePlus 7 Pro
Smartphone 2
Google Pixel 3 XL
Smartphone 3
OnePlus 7 Pro or Google Pixel 3 XL Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | OnePlus 7 Pro | Google Pixel 3 XL | |
| Rating | (+0) | (+0) | |
| Release date | 2019, May | 2018, October | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 162.6 x 75.9 x 8.8 mm | 6.4 x 6.4 x 2.99 in | 158 x 76.7 x 7.9 mm | 6.22 x 6.22 x 3.02 in | |
| Weight | 206 g | 7.27 oz | 184 g | 6.49 oz | |
| Body Build | Front/back glass, aluminum frame | Front/back glass (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | |
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Mirror Grey, Almond, Nebula Blue | Clearly White, Just Black, Not Pink | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh, Non-removable Li-Po | 3430 mAh, Non-removable Li-Po | |
| Approximate price | 700 EUR | 960 EUR | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | Fluid AMOLED | P-OLED | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
| Screen size | 6.67" in | 6.3" in | |
| Screen area | 108.8 cm2 | 100.3 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 19.5:9 (height:width) | 18.5:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 88.1% | 82.8% | |
| Screen resolution | 1440 x 3120 px | 1440 x 2960 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 516 PPI | 523 PPI | |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | |
| Other specs | - DCI-P3 -HDR10+ -90Hz |
- Always-on display -100% DCI-P3 -HDR |
|
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 48 MP, Triple | 12.2 MP, Single | |
| Camera specs | -48 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/2'', 0.8µm, Laser/PDAF, OIS -16 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide) -8 MP, f/2.4, 78mm (telephoto), 3x zoom, Laser/PDAF, OIS |
-12.2 MP, f/1.8, 28mm (wide), 1/2.55'', 1.4µm, OIS, dual pixel PDAF | |
| Functions | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, Auto-HDR, panorama | |
| Video | 2160p@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 720p@480fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS | 2160p@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@240fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) | |
| DxOMark Main Score | 114 | 102 | |
| DxOMark Photo | 122 | 103 | |
| DxOMark Video | 98 | 98 | |
| Front camera, selfie | 16 MP, Single | 8 MP, Dual | |
| Specifications | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.0'', 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/1.8, 28mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 19mm (ultrawide), no AF |
|
| Functions | Auto-HDR | Auto-HDR | |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps | |
| DxOMark Selfie Score | 86 | 92 | |
| DxOMark Photo | 90 | 99 | |
| DxOMark Video | 81 | 83 |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 9.0 (Pie); OxygenOS 9 | Android 9.0 (Pie) | |
| Chipset | - Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) | - Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm) | |
| CPU | - Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 485) | - Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Kryo 385 Gold & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 385 Silver) | |
| GPU | Adreno 640 | Adreno 630 | |
| External memory | No | No | |
| Internal memory | 256 GB, 8/12 GB RAM 128 GB, 6 GB RAM | 64/128 GB, 4 GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 8 Total | 473991 | 275382 | |
| Antutu 7 Total | |||
| GeekBench 6 Single Core | 942 | 510 | |
| GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 2605 | 1648 | |
| GeekBench 6 OpenCL | 2443 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Vulkan | 2196 | 1441 | |
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 729 | 490 | |
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 2678 | 1996 | |
| GeekBench 4 Single Core | 3428 | 2289 | |
| GeekBench 4 Multi-Core | 10717 | 8039 | |
| GeekBench 4 RenderScript | 7260 | 13325 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM card & eSIM | |
| Network | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 CDMA 800 / 1900 & TD-SCDMA -3G - HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE band 1(2100), 2(1900), 3(1800), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 12(700), 13(700), 17(700), 18(800), 19(800), 20(800), 25(1900), 26(850), 28(700), 29(700), 32(1500), 34(2000), 38(2600), 39(1900), 40(2300), 41(2500), 66(1700/2100) - Global LTE band 1(2100), 2(1900), 3(1800), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 12(700), 13(700), 17(700), 18(800), 19(800), 20(800), 25(1900), 26(850), 28(700), 29(700), 32(1500), 34(2000), 38(2600), 39(1900), 41(2500), 46, 48, 66(1700/2100), 71(600) - North America |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 CDMA 800 / 1900 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 CDMA2000 1xEV-DO -4G - LTE band 1(2100), 2(1900), 3(1800), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 12(700), 13(700), 17(700), 18(800), 19(800), 20(800), 25(1900), 26(850), 28(700), 29(700), 32(1500), 38(2600), 39(1900), 40(2300), 41(2500), 42(3500), 46, 66(1700/2100), 71(600) |
|
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A (5CA) Cat16 1024/75 Mbps | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, WiFi Direct, DLNA, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA, hotspot | |
| GPS | Yes, with dual-band A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, SBAS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | |
| NFC | Yes | Yes | |
| USB | 3.1, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector, USB On-The-Go | 3.1, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector (PowerDelivery 2.0) | |
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
Music and Audio
| Radio | No | No | |
| Headphone jack | No | No | |
| Others | - Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic -Dolby Atmos sound |
- Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (under display), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | - Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | |
| Other extras |
- Fast battery charging 30W (Warp Charge) |
- Fast battery charging 9V/2A 18W -QI wireless charging - IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) |
|
| Versions |
- Also known as Google Pixel XL3 |
Reviews and Opinions on OnePlus 7 Pro and Google Pixel 3 XL
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!