Oppo A58 4G vs Samsung Galaxy A14 4G Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Oppo A58 4G
Smartphone 2
Samsung Galaxy A14 4G
Smartphone 3
Differences between Oppo A58 4G and Samsung Galaxy A14 4G - Which to Choose?
Reasons to consider the Oppo A58 4G:
- Higher Antutu benchmark score of 215389, indicating potentially better performance.
- Fast charging support of 33W, which is more efficient than the Samsung Galaxy A14 4G's 15W.
- Mali-G52 MC2 GPU paired with the Mediatek MT6769 Helio G85 chipset may offer better gaming and multitasking performance.
- A slightly bigger screen size of 6.72 inches which might be more appealing for users who prefer larger displays.
- Features stereo speakers for improved audio experience.
- Higher screen-to-body ratio of 86.6%, which means more screen real estate in a similar body size.
- Bluetooth 5.3 support, offering potentially better connectivity with the latest peripherals.
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A14 4G:
- Offers a higher-megapixel ultrawide camera for capturing wider scenes and a dedicated macro camera.
- Higher resolution selfi camera at 13 MP, which might produce better front camera photos.
- Comes with Samsung's One UI Core 5, which some users might prefer over Oppo's ColorOS.
- Has a slightly higher pixel density of 400 PPI versus Oppo's 392 PPI, indicating a potentially sharper display.
- Dedicated microSDXC slot allowing for potentially better dual SIM and SD card usage simultaneously.
- A lower SAR EU value, suggesting less radio frequency energy absorption.
- Availability of multiple versions with varying RAM and storage configurations.
When choosing a smartphone, one must consider personal usage patterns, brand preference, software ecosystem, budget, and the importance of specific features such as camera capabilities, performance, battery life, and charging speed.
Oppo A58 4G or Samsung Galaxy A14 4G Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Oppo A58 4G | Samsung Galaxy A14 4G | |
| Rating | (+0) | (+0) | |
| Release date | 2023, July 26 | 2023, February 28 | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 165.7 x 76 x 8 mm | 6.52 x 6.52 x 2.99 in | 167.7 x 78 x 9.1 mm | 6.6 x 6.6 x 3.07 in | |
| Weight | 192 g | 6.77 oz | 201 g | 7.09 oz | |
| Body Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | |
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Glowing Black, Dazzling Green | Black, Dark Red, Silver, Green | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | 5000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | |
| Approximate price | 150 EUR | $ 160 | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | IPS LCD | PLS LCD | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
| Screen size | 6.72" in | 6.6" in | |
| Screen area | 109.0 cm2 | 104.9 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 20:9 (height:width) | 20:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 86.6% | 80.2% | |
| Screen resolution | 1080 x 2400 px | 1080 x 2408 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 392 PPI | 400 PPI | |
| Other specs | - 550 nits (typ), 680 nits (HBM) - |
||
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 50 MP, Dual | 50 MP, Triple | |
| Camera specs | -50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF -2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
-50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF -5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) -2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
|
| Functions | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR | |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps | |
| Front camera, selfie | 8 MP, Single | 13 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | |
| Functions | Panorama | ||
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 13, One UI Core 5 | |
| Chipset | - Mediatek MT6769 Helio G85 (12 nm) | - Mediatek MT6769 Helio G80 (12 nm) - Exynos 850 (8nm) - USA |
|
| CPU | - Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | - Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - USA |
|
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 | |
| External memory | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | |
| Internal memory | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 9 Total | 215389 | 145741 | |
| GeekBench 6 Single Core | 213 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 1005 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 502 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 1600 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Single SIM (Nano-SIM)Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 900 / 1800 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 -3G - HSDPA 900 / 2100 -4G - 1, 3, 5, 8, 40 |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual sim model only) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 -4G - 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
|
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | |
| GPS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | |
| NFC | Yes | Yes | |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 | |
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE | |
| Harmful irradiation |
SAR EU - 0.46 W/kg (head) 1.37 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
| Radio | No | ||
| Headphone jack | Yes | Yes | |
| Others |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass , Infrared port | - Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | |
| Other extras |
- 33W Fast charging, 56% in 30 min |
- Fast charging 15W |
Reviews and Opinions on Oppo A58 4G and Samsung Galaxy A14 4G
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!