Oppo F9 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S8 Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Oppo F9 Pro
Smartphone 2
Samsung Galaxy S8
Smartphone 3
Oppo F9 Pro or Samsung Galaxy S8 Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
Brand and model | Oppo F9 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
Rating | (+) | (+) | |
Release date | 2018, August | 2017, March | |
Dimensions (HxWxD) | 156.7 x 74 x 8 mm | 6.17 x 6.17 x 2.91 in | 148.9 x 68.1 x 8 mm | 5.86 x 5.86 x 2.68 in | |
Weight | 169 g | 5.96 oz | 155 g | 5.47 oz | |
Body Build | Front/back glass (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | ||
Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
Colors | Sunrise Red, Twilight Blue, Starry Purple | Midnight Black, Orchid Gray, Arctic Silver, Coral Blue, Maple Gold, Rose Pink, Burgundy Red | |
Battery | 3500 mAh, Non-removable Li-Po | 3000 mAh, Non-removable Li-Ion | |
Battery life |
Talking time - Up to 20 h (3G) Music play - Up to 67 h |
||
Approximate price | 290 EUR | 390 EUR | |
Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
Technology | LTPS IPS LCD | Super AMOLED | |
Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
Screen size | 6.3" in | 5.8" in | |
Screen area | 97.4 cm2 | 84.8 cm2 | |
Screen format | 19.5:9 (height:width) | 18.5:9 (height:width) | |
Screen to body ratio | 84.0% | 83.6% | |
Screen resolution | 1080 x 2340 px | 1440 x 2960 px | |
Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 409 PPI | 570 PPI | |
Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | |
Other specs | - HDR10 -3D Touch (home button only) -Always-on display |
||
Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
Rear camera, main | 16 MP, Dual | 12 MP, Single | |
Camera specs | -16 MP, f/1.8, 1/3.1, 1.0µm, PDAF -2 MP, f/2.4, depth sensor |
-12 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.55'', 1.4µm, OIS, dual pixel PDAF | |
Functions | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama | |
Video | 1080p@30fps | 2160p@30fps, 1080p@60fps, 720p@240fps, HDR, dual-video rec. | |
Front camera, selfie | 25 MP, Single | 8 MP, Single | |
Specifications | 25 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8'', 0.9µm | 8 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/3.6'', 1.22µm, AF | |
Functions | Dual video call, Auto-HDR | ||
Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps | |
DxOMark Selfie Score | 73 | ||
DxOMark Photo | 71 | ||
DxOMark Video | 75 |
Performance
Operating system - OS | Android 8.1 (Oreo); ColorOS 5.2 | Android 7.0 (Nougat), upgradable to Android 8.0 (Oreo) | |
Chipset | - Mediatek MT6771 Helio P60 (12 nm) | - Exynos 8895 Octa (10 nm) - Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835 (10 nm) - USA & China |
|
CPU | - Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | - Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Mongoose M2 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) - EMEA -Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Kryo & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo) - USA & China |
|
GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Mali-G71 MP20 - EMEA Adreno 540 - USA & China |
|
External memory | microSD, up to 256 GB (dedicated slot) | microSD, up to 512 GB (uses SIM 2 slot) - dual SIM model only | |
Internal memory | 64 GB, 6 GB 4 GB RAM | 64 GB, 4 GB RAM |
Benchmark
Antutu 8 Total | 231907 | ||
Antutu 7 Total | |||
GeekBench 6 Single Core | 306 | 361 | |
GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 1103 | 1243 | |
GeekBench 6 OpenCL | 1087 | 1255 | |
GeekBench 6 Vulkan | 531 | ||
GeekBench 5 Single Core | 284 | 340 | |
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 1329 | 1454 | |
GeekBench 4 Single Core | 1763 | ||
GeekBench 4 Multi-Core | 6028 | ||
GeekBench 4 RenderScript | 8798 | ||
GeekBench 4 Battery | 3410 |
Communication and Connectivity
SIM card | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Single SIM (Nano-SIM)Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE | |
Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - all versions -4G - LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 20(800), 28(700), 38(2600), 40(2300), 41(2500) LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 38(2600), 40(2300), 41(2500) LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 8(900), 38(2600), 40(2300), 41(2500) |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE band 1(2100), 2(1900), 3(1800), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 12(700), 13(700), 17(700), 18(800), 19(800), 20(800), 25(1900), 26(850), 28(700), 32(1500), 66(1700/2100), 38(2600), 39(1900), 40(2300), 41(2500) |
|
Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A (2CA) Cat13 600/100 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A (5CA) Cat16 1024/150 Mbps | |
GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
Edge | Yes | Yes | |
Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, WiFi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | |
GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | |
NFC | Yes | ||
USB | microUSB 2.0, USB On-The-Go | 3.1, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector | |
Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | |
Harmful irradiation |
SAR - 0.44 W/kg (head) 0.75 W/kg (body) SAR EU - 0.32 W/kg (head) 1.27 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
Radio | FM radio | No | |
Headphone jack | Yes | Yes | |
Others | - Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic | - 32-bit/384kHz audio -Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic |
Other features
Sensors | - Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | - Iris scanner, fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, heart rate, SpO2 | |
Other extras |
- Fast battery charging: VOOC Flash Charge 5V/4A 20W |
- Samsung DeX (desktop experience support) - -ANT+ -Bixby natural language commands and dictation - Fast battery charging (Quick Charge 2.0) -Qi/PMA wireless charging (market dependent) - Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) -IP68 dust/water proof (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) |
|
Versions |
- Versions: F9 (Global market); F9 (India); F9 Pro (India) |
- Versions: G950F (Europe, Global Single-SIM); G950FD (Global Dual-SIM); G950U (USA Unlocked); G950A (AT&T); G950P (Sprint); G950T (T-Mobile); G950V (Verizon); G950R4 (US Cellular); G950W (Canada); G950 |
Reviews and Opinions on Oppo F9 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S8
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!