Oppo Find N vs Oppo Find X5 Pro Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Oppo Find N
Smartphone 2
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Smartphone 3
Oppo Find N or Oppo Find X5 Pro Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Oppo Find N | Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
| Rating | (+) | (+) | |
| Release date | 2021, December 15 | 2022, February 24 | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 132.6 x 140.2 x 8.0 mm | 5.22 x 5.22 x 5.52 in | 163.7 x 73.9 x 8.5 mm | 6.44 x 6.44 x 2.91 in | |
| Weight | 275 g | 9.7 oz | 218 g | 7.69 oz | |
| Body Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus) - folded, plastic front - unfolded, glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), ceramic back or eco leather back, aluminum frame | |
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Black, White, Purple | Ceramic Black, Ceramic White, Blue (eco leather) | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | 5000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | |
| Approximate price | 1070 EUR | 1300 EUR | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | LTPO2 AMOLED | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 1B | |
| Screen size | 7.1" in | 6.7" in | |
| Screen area | 162.2 cm2 | 108.4 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 18:9 (height:width) | 20:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 87.3% | 89.6% | |
| Screen resolution | 1792 x 1920 px | 1440 x 3216 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 0 PPI | 525 PPI | |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | ||
| Other specs | - 120Hz -HDR10+ -500 nits (typ) -800 nits (HBM) -1000 nits (peak) -Cover display: -AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus -5.49“ , 988 x 1972 px, 18:9 |
- 120Hz -HDR10+ -BT.2020 -500 nits (typ) -800 nits (HBM) -1300 nits (peak) |
|
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 50 MP, Triple | 50 MP, Triple | |
| Camera specs | -50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56'', 1.0µm, omnidirectional PDAF, OIS -13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4'', 1.0µm, 2x optical zoom, PDAF -16 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.09'', 1.0µm |
-50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS (3-axis sensor-shift, 2-axis lens-shift) -13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 2x optical zoom, PDAF -50 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF |
|
| Functions | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama | |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video | |
| DxOMark Main Score | 130 | ||
| DxOMark Photo | 136 | ||
| DxOMark Video | 111 | ||
| Front camera, selfie | 32 MP, Single | 32 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74'', 0.8µm Cover camera: 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74'', 0.8µm |
32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | |
| Functions | HDR, panorama | Panorama | |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | |
| DxOMark Selfie Score | 89 | ||
| DxOMark Photo | 95 | ||
| DxOMark Video | 78 |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 11, ColorOS 12 | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | |
| Chipset | - Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | - Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) - MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) - China |
|
| CPU | - Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 680 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 680 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 680) | - Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 730Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) - China | |
| External memory | No | No | |
| Internal memory | 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 9 Total | 836211 | 1013989 | |
| GeekBench 6 Single Core | 1449 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 3786 | ||
| GeekBench 6 OpenCL | 6053 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Vulkan | 5822 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 1285 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 4211 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, eSIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 CDMA 800 -3G - HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 CDMA2000 1xEV-DO -4G - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 -5G - 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 CDMA 800 -3G - HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 CDMA2000 1x -4G - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - Global -5G - 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - Global |
|
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A (CA), 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A, 5G | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | |
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS (1), BDS (3), GALILEO (2), QZSS (2) | Yes, with dual-band A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | |
| NFC | Yes | Yes | |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, USB On-The-Go | USB Type-C 3.1, USB On-The-Go | |
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
Music and Audio
| Radio | No | No | |
| Headphone jack | No | No | |
| Others |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, dual gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum | |
| Other extras |
- Fast charging 33W, 55% in 30 min, 100% in 70 min -Fast wireless charging 15W -Reverse charging 10W |
- Fast charging 80W, 50% in 12 min -Fast wireless charging 50W, 100% in 47 min -Reverse wireless charging 10W -USB Power Delivery - IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) |
Reviews and Opinions on Oppo Find N and Oppo Find X5 Pro
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!
