Oppo Find N2 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Oppo Find N2
Smartphone 2
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
Smartphone 3
Oppo Find N2 or Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Oppo Find N2 | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 | |
| Rating | (+) | (+) | |
| Release date | 2022, December 23 | 2022, August 10 | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 132.2 x 72.6 x 14.6 mm | 5.2 x 5.2 x 2.86 in | 155.1 x 130.1 x 6.3 mm | 6.11 x 6.11 x 5.12 in | |
| Weight | 233 g | 8.22 oz | 263 g | 9.28 oz | |
| Body Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus) - folded, plastic front - unfolded, glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus) or eco leather back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+) (folded), plastic front (unfolded), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus+), aluminum frame | |
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Black, Green, White | Graygreen, Phantom Black, Beige, Burgundy | |
| Battery | 4520 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | 4400 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | |
| Approximate price | 1100 EUR | $ 1800 | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 120HzHDR1 | 16M | |
| Screen size | 7.1" in | 7.6" in | |
| Screen area | 162.2 cm2 | 183.2 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 18:9 (height:width) | 23.1:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 87.3% | 90.9% | |
| Screen resolution | 1792 x 1920 px | 1812 x 2176 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 0 PPI | 0 PPI | |
| Other specs | - 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1550 nits (peak) -Cover display: -AMOLED, 120Hz, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus, 5.54 inches, 1080 x 2120 pixels, 18:9 ratio, 1000 nits (HBM), 1350 nits (peak) |
- 120Hz -HDR10+ -1200 nits (peak) -Cover display: -Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ -6.2 inches, 904 x 2316 pixels, 23.1:9 ratio |
|
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 50 MP, Triple | 50 MP, Triple | |
| Camera specs | -50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS -32 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, 2x optical zoom, PDAF -48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/2", 0.8µm, AF |
-50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0µm, Dual Pixel PDAF, OIS -10 MP, f/2.4, 66mm (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom -12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, 12mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
|
| Functions | Hasselblad Color Calibration, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama | |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@60fps, 1080p@60/240fps (gyro-EIS), 720p@960fps (gyro-EIS), HDR10+ | |
| DxOMark Main Score | 124 | ||
| DxOMark Photo | 130 | ||
| DxOMark Video | 122 | ||
| Front camera, selfie | 32 MP, Single | 4 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/3.14" | 4 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 2.0µm, under display Cover camera: 10 MP, f/2.2, 24mm (wide), 1/3'', 1.22µm |
|
| Functions | HDR, panorama | HDR | |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 13, ColorOS 13 | Android 12L, One UI 4.1.1 | |
| Chipset | - Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | - Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | |
| CPU | - Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | - Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 | |
| External memory | No | No | |
| Internal memory | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 9 Total | 985549 | 986201 | |
| GeekBench 6 Single Core | 1674 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 4102 | ||
| GeekBench 6 OpenCL | 5428 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Vulkan | 7041 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 1262 | 1241 | |
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 3902 | 3708 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Up to two Nano SIM and one eSIM | |
| Network | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 CDMA 800 -3G - HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 CDMA2000 1xEV-DO -4G - LTE -5G - SA/NSA |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) CDMA 800 / 1900 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 CDMA2000 1xEV-DO -4G - LTE -5G - SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave |
|
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A (7CA) Cat20 2000/200 Mbps, 5G | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, tri-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | |
| GPS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | |
| NFC | Yes | Yes | |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, USB On-The-Go | USB Type-C 3.2, USB On-The-Go | |
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | |
| Harmful irradiation |
SAR - 0.96 W/kg (head) 0.92 W/kg (body) SAR EU - 1.30 W/kg (head) 1.51 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
| Radio | No | No | |
| Headphone jack | No | No | |
| Others | - 32-bit/384kHz audio -Tuned by AKG |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, dual gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum | - Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | |
| Other extras |
- --Stylus support - Fast charging 67W, 100% in 42 min -Reverse charging 10W |
- Bixby natural language commands and dictation -Samsung DeX (desktop experience support) -Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) -Ultra Wideband (UWB) support - Fast charging 25W, 50% in 30 min -Fast wireless charging 15W -Reverse wireless charging 4.5W - IPX8 water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) -Armor aluminum frame with tougher drop and scratch resistance -Stylus support |
|
| Versions |
- Also known as Samsung Galaxy Fold 4 5G |
Reviews and Opinions on Oppo Find N2 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!