Oppo Find X5 Lite vs Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Oppo Find X5 Lite
Smartphone 2
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Smartphone 3
Oppo Find X5 Lite or Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Oppo Find X5 Lite | Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
| Rating | (+) | (+) | |
| Release date | 2022, February 24 | 2024, January 17 | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 160.6 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm | 6.32 x 6.32 x 2.88 in | 162.3 x 79 x 8.6 mm | 6.39 x 6.39 x 3.11 in | |
| Weight | 173 g | 6.1 oz | 232 g | 8.18 oz | |
| Body Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Armor), glass back (Gorilla Glass), titanium frame | ||
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Starlight Black, Startrails Blue | Titanium Black, Titanium Gray, Titanium Violet, Titanium Yellow, Titanium Blue, Titanium Green, Titanium Orange | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | 5000 mAh, Li-Ion, non-removable | |
| Approximate price | $ 655 | 1200 EUR | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | AMOLED | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
| Screen size | 6.43" in | 6.8" in | |
| Screen area | 99.8 cm2 | 113.5 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 20:9 (height:width) | 19.5:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 84.9% | 88.5% | |
| Screen resolution | 1080 x 2400 px | 1440 x 3120 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 409 PPI | 505 PPI | |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Armor | |
| Other specs | - 90Hz -HDR10+ -430 nits (typ) -600 nits (HDR) -800 nits (peak) |
- 120Hz, HDR10+, 2600 nits (peak) -Always-on display |
|
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 64 MP, Triple | 200 MP, Quad | |
| Camera specs | -64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0'', 0.7µm, PDAF -8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚ (ultrawide) -2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
-200 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.3", 0.6µm, multi-directional PDAF, Laser AF, OIS -10 MP, f/2.4, 67mm (telephoto), 1/3.52", 1.12µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom -50 MP, f/3.4, 111mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.52", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom -12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, Super Steady video |
|
| Functions | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama | |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS | |
| DxOMark Main Score | 106 | 144 | |
| DxOMark Photo | 110 | 144 | |
| DxOMark Video | 95 | 137 | |
| Front camera, selfie | 32 MP, Single | 12 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | 12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), dual pixel PDAF | |
| Functions | Panorama | Dual video call, Auto-HDR, HDR10+ | |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 11, ColorOS 12 | Android 14, One UI 6.1 | |
| Chipset | - MediaTek MT6877 Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | - Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) | |
| CPU | - Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | - 8-core (1x3.39GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.1GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.9GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.2GHz Cortex-A520) | |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 750 (1 GHz) | |
| External memory | microSDXC | No | |
| Internal memory | 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 10 Total | 1523833 | ||
| Antutu 10 CPU | 452123 | ||
| Antutu 10 GPU | 374852 | ||
| Antutu 10 Mem | 386963 | ||
| Antutu 10 UX | 452123 | ||
| Antutu 9 Total | 475438 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Single Core | 2267 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 7085 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 715 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 2138 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM and eSIM or Dual SIM (2 Nano-SIMs and eSIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 -3G - HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 -5G - 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (Dual SIM model only) CDMA 800 / 1900 & TD-SCDMA -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 CDMA2000 1xEV-DO -4G - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International -5G - 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA |
|
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A (CA), 5G | HSPA, LTE-A (up to 7CA), 5G | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | |
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | |
| NFC | Yes | Yes | |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, USB On-The-Go | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG | |
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE | |
| Harmful irradiation |
SAR - 1.26 W/kg (head) 0.62 W/kg (body) SAR EU - 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.30 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
| Radio | No | No | |
| Headphone jack | Yes | No | |
| Others | - 32-bit/384kHz audio -Tuned by AKG |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | - Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | |
| Other extras |
- Fast charging 65W, 100% in 31 min -Reverse charging -USB Power Delivery |
- Samsung DeX, Samsung Wireless DeX (desktop experience support) -Ultra Wideband (UWB) support - 45W Fast charging, Power Delivery 3.0, 65% in 30 min -15W Wireless charging (Qi/PMA) -4.5W Reverse wireless charging - IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) -Stylus (Bluetooth integration, accelerometer, gyro) |
Reviews and Opinions on Oppo Find X5 Lite and Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!
