Oppo Find X7 Ultra vs Oppo Find X3 Pro Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Smartphone 2
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Smartphone 3
Oppo Find X7 Ultra or Oppo Find X3 Pro Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Oppo Find X7 Ultra | Oppo Find X3 Pro | |
| Rating | (+0) | (+0) | |
| Release date | 2024, January 08 | 2021, March 11 | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 164.3 x 76.2 x 9.5 mm | 6.47 x 6.47 x 3 in | 163.6 x 74 x 8.3 mm | 6.44 x 6.44 x 2.91 in | |
| Weight | 221 g | 7.8 oz | 193 g | 6.81 oz | |
| Body Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass) or eco leather back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | |
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Black, Dark Blue, Light Brown | Gloss Black, Blue, White, Cosmic Mocha | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh, , non-removable | 4500 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | |
| Approximate price | 770 EUR | 1150 EUR | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 1B | 1B | |
| Screen size | 6.82" in | 6.7" in | |
| Screen area | 113.0 cm2 | 108.4 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 20:9 (height:width) | ||
| Screen to body ratio | 90.3% | 89.6% | |
| Screen resolution | 1440 x 3168 px | 1440 x 3216 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 510 PPI | 525 PPI | |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | |
| Other specs | - 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (typ), 2600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) - |
- 120Hz -HDR10+ -BT.2020 -500 nits (typ) -1300 nits (peak) |
|
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 50 MP, Quad | 50 MP, Quad | |
| Camera specs | -50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS -50 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, 2.8x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF (25cm - ∞), OIS -50 MP, f/4.3, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, 6x optical zoom, dual pixel PDAF (35cm - ∞), OIS -50 MP, f/2.0, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.95", 1.0µm, PDAF |
-50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, omnidirectional PDAF, OIS -13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 2x optical zoom, PDAF -50 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, omnidirectional PDAF -3 MP, f/3.0, (microscope), AF, ring flash, 60x magnification |
|
| Functions | Laser AF, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama | |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video | |
| DxOMark Main Score | 157 | 131 | |
| DxOMark Photo | 156 | 139 | |
| DxOMark Video | 156 | 111 | |
| Front camera, selfie | 32 MP, Single | 32 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8'', 0.8µm | |
| Functions | Panorama | Panorama | |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14 | Android 11, ColorOS 11.2 | |
| Chipset | - Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) | - Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 (5 nm) | |
| CPU | - Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) | - Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 680 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 680 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 680 | |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Adreno 660 | |
| External memory | No | No | |
| Internal memory | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 8 Total | 827943 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 1121 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 3741 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, eSIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 CDMA 800 -3G - HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 CDMA2000 1x -4G - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 -5G - 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 CDMA 800 -3G - HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 CDMA2000 1x -4G - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International -5G - 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
|
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A, 5G | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | |
| GPS | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS | Yes, with dual-band A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | |
| NFC | Yes; NFC-SIM, HCE, eSE, eID | Yes | |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, USB On-The-Go | |
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
Music and Audio
| Radio | No | No | |
| Headphone jack | No | No | |
| Others |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum , Infrared port | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum | |
| Other extras |
- Emergency SOS via satellite (messages and calls) available in Oppo Find X7 Ultra Satellite version (PHY120) - 100W Fast charging, Power Delivery , 50% in 10 min, 100% in 26 min -50W Wireless charging -10W Reverse wireless charging - IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) |
- Fast charging 65W, 40% in 10 min -Fast wireless charging 30W, 100% in 80 min -Reverse wireless charging 10W -SuperVOOC 2.0 -USB Power Delivery - IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) |
Reviews and Opinions on Oppo Find X7 Ultra and Oppo Find X3 Pro
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!