Oppo Find X8 Pro vs Google Pixel 9 Pro Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Smartphone 2
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Smartphone 3
Oppo Find X8 Pro or Google Pixel 9 Pro Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Oppo Find X8 Pro | Google Pixel 9 Pro | |
| Rating | (+0) | (+0) | |
| Release date | 2024, October 24 | 2024, August 13 | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 162.3 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm | 6.39 x 6.39 x 3.02 in | 152.8 x 72 x 8.5 mm | 6.02 x 6.02 x 2.83 in | |
| Weight | 215 g | 7.58 oz | 199 g | 7.02 oz | |
| Body Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame | |
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Black, White, Blue | Porcelain, Rose Quartz, Hazel, Obsidian | |
| Battery | 5910 mAh, Si/C, non-removable | 4700 mAh, Li-Ion, non-removable | |
| Approximate price | 700 EUR | $ 1,014.7 | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO OLED | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 1B | 16M | |
| Screen size | 6.78" in | 6.3" in | |
| Screen area | 111.7 cm2 | 96.3 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 20:9 (height:width) | ||
| Screen to body ratio | 89.8% | 87.6% | |
| Screen resolution | 1264 x 2780 px | 1280 x 2856 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 450 PPI | 495 PPI | |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | |
| Other specs | - 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) -HDR image support |
- 120Hz, HDR10+, 2000 nits (HBM), 3000 nits (peak) -Always-on display |
|
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 50 MP, Quad | 50 MP, Triple | |
| Camera specs | -50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), PDAF, OIS -50 MP, f/2.6, 73mm (periscope telephoto), 3x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS -50 MP, f/4.3, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, 6x optical zoom, dual pixel PDAF (35cm - ∞), OIS -50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), PDAF |
-50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS -48 MP, f/2.8, 113mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.55", dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom -48 MP, f/1.7, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55", dual pixel PDAF |
|
| Functions | Laser AF, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Multi-zone Laser AF, LED flash, Pixel Shift, Ultra-HDR, panorama, Best Take, Zoom Enhance | |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision | 8K@30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@24/30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR | |
| Front camera, selfie | 32 MP, Single | 42 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 42 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), PDAF | |
| Functions | Panorama | HDR, panorama | |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, up to 7 major Android upgrades | |
| Chipset | - Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3 nm) | - Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) | |
| CPU | - Octa-core (1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) | - Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.92 GHz Cortex-A520) | |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 | Mali-G715 MC7 | |
| External memory | No | No | |
| Internal memory | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 16GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
Benchmark
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM and eSIM | |
| Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 -3G - HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 -5G - 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 -3G - HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GR83Y 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71, 75 - GEC77 -5G - 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - GR83Y 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GEC77 |
|
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE (CA), 5G | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band | |
| GPS | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS, NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | |
| NFC | Yes; NFC-SIM, HCE, eSE, eID | Yes | |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 | |
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | |
| Harmful irradiation |
SAR EU - 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.37 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
| Radio | No | No | |
| Headphone jack | No | No | |
| Others |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum , Infrared port | - Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer (skin temperature) | |
| Other extras |
- Satellite connectivity support (PKC130, 1TB 16GB RAM model only) - 80W Fast charging, Power Delivery , PPS, UFCS -50W Wireless charging - IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) |
- Ultra Wideband (UWB) support -Satellite SOS service -Circle to Search - 27W Fast charging, Power Delivery 3.0, PPS, 55% in 30 min -21W Wireless charging (w/ Pixel Stand) -12W Wireless charging (w/ Qi compatible charger) -Reverse Wireless charging - IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) |
Reviews and Opinions on Oppo Find X8 Pro and Google Pixel 9 Pro
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!