Oppo Find X5 Pro vs Asus ROG Phone 5s Pro Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Smartphone 2
Asus ROG Phone 5s Pro
Smartphone 3
Oppo Find X5 Pro or Asus ROG Phone 5s Pro Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Oppo Find X5 Pro | Asus ROG Phone 5s Pro | |
| Rating | (+) | (+) | |
| Release date | 2022, February 24 | Exp. release 2021 Q4 | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 163.7 x 73.9 x 8.5 mm | 6.44 x 6.44 x 2.91 in | 172.8 x 77.3 x 9.9 mm | 6.8 x 6.8 x 3.04 in | |
| Weight | 218 g | 7.69 oz | 238 g | 8.4 oz | |
| Body Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), ceramic back or eco leather back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame | |
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Ceramic Black, Ceramic White, Blue (eco leather) | Matte White | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | 6000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | |
| Approximate price | 1300 EUR | $ 1650 | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | LTPO2 AMOLED | AMOLED | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 1B | 1B | |
| Screen size | 6.7" in | 6.78" in | |
| Screen area | 108.4 cm2 | 109.5 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 20:9 (height:width) | ||
| Screen to body ratio | 89.6% | 82.0% | |
| Screen resolution | 1440 x 3216 px | 1080 x 2448 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 525 PPI | 0 PPI | |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | |
| Other specs | - 120Hz -HDR10+ -BT.2020 -500 nits (typ) -800 nits (HBM) -1300 nits (peak) |
- 144Hz -HDR10+ -800 nits (typ) -1200 nits (peak) |
|
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 50 MP, Triple | 64 MP, Triple | |
| Camera specs | -50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS (3-axis sensor-shift, 2-axis lens-shift) -13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 2x optical zoom, PDAF -50 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF |
-64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73'', 0.8µm, PDAF -13 MP, f/2.4, 11mm, 125˚ (ultrawide) -5 MP, f/2.0, (macro) |
|
| Functions | Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama | |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 720p@480fps; gyro-EIS | |
| DxOMark Main Score | 130 | ||
| DxOMark Photo | 136 | ||
| DxOMark Video | 111 | ||
| Front camera, selfie | 32 MP, Single | 24 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 24 MP, f/2.5, 27mm (wide), 0.9µm | |
| Functions | Panorama | Panorama, HDR | |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps | |
| DxOMark Selfie Score | 89 | ||
| DxOMark Photo | 95 | ||
| DxOMark Video | 78 |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 11, ROG UI | |
| Chipset | - Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) - MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) - China |
- Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) | |
| CPU | - Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | - Octa-core (1x2.99 GHz Kryo 680 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 680 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 680) | |
| GPU | Adreno 730Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) - China | Adreno 660 | |
| External memory | No | No | |
| Internal memory | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 512GB 18GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 9 Total | 1013989 | 811473 | |
| GeekBench 6 Single Core | 1449 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 3786 | ||
| GeekBench 6 OpenCL | 6053 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Vulkan | 5822 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 1285 | 1144 | |
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 4211 | 3794 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, eSIM, dual stand-by) | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 CDMA 800 -3G - HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 CDMA2000 1x -4G - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - Global -5G - 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - Global |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 -3G - HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 -4G - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 -5G - 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
|
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A (7CA) Cat20 1400/150 Mbps, 5G 4 Gbps DL | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | |
| GPS | Yes, with dual-band A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | Yes, with dual-band A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, GNSS | |
| NFC | Yes | Yes | |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, USB On-The-Go | USB Type-C 3.1 (side), USB Type-C 2.0 (bottom), accessory connector, USB On-The-Go | |
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
Music and Audio
| Radio | No | No | |
| Headphone jack | No | Yes | |
| Others | - 24-bit/192kHz audio |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | |
| Other extras |
- Fast charging 80W, 50% in 12 min -Fast wireless charging 50W, 100% in 47 min -Reverse wireless charging 10W -USB Power Delivery - IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) |
- --Pressure sensitive zones (Gaming triggers) -Touch sensor; ROG Vision monochrome PMOLED display (on the back) - Fast charging 65W, 70% in 30 min, 100% in 52 min -Reverse charging 10W -Power Delivery 3.0 -Quick Charge 5 |
Reviews and Opinions on Oppo Find X5 Pro and Asus ROG Phone 5s Pro
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!