Samsung Ativ Odyssey I930 vs Samsung Galaxy A12 Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Samsung Ativ Odyssey I930
Smartphone 2
Samsung Galaxy A12
Smartphone 3
Samsung Ativ Odyssey I930 or Samsung Galaxy A12 Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Samsung Ativ Odyssey I930 | Samsung Galaxy A12 | |
| Rating | (+) | (+) | |
| Release date | 2013, January | 2020, November 24 | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 122.4 x 63.8 x 10.9 mm | 4.82 x 4.82 x 2.51 in | 164 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm | 6.46 x 6.46 x 2.98 in | |
| Weight | 125 g | 4.41 oz | 205 g | 7.23 oz | |
| Body Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | ||
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Gray | Black, White, Blue, Red | |
| Battery | 2100 mAh, Removable Li-Ion | 5000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | |
| Battery life |
Stand by time - Up to 168 h Talking time - Up to 19 h |
||
| Approximate price | 200 EUR | $ 170 | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | Super AMOLED | PLS IPS | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
| Screen size | 4" in | 6.5" in | |
| Screen area | 45.5 cm2 | 102.0 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 5:3 (height:width) | 20:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 58.3% | 82.1% | |
| Screen resolution | 480 x 800 px | 720 x 1600 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 233 PPI | 270 PPI | |
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 5 MP, Single | 48 MP, Quad | |
| Camera specs | -5 MP, AF | -48 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), AF -5 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide) -2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) -2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
|
| Functions | LED flash | LED flash, panorama, HDR | |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps | |
| DxOMark Main Score | 90 | ||
| DxOMark Photo | 96 | ||
| DxOMark Video | 80 | ||
| Front camera, selfie | 1.2 MP, Single | 8 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 1.2 MP | 8 MP, f/2.2 | |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Microsoft Windows Phone 8 | Android 10 | |
| Chipset | - Qualcomm MSM8960 Snapdragon S4 Plus | - Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12nm) | |
| CPU | - Dual-core 1.5 GHz Krait | - Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | |
| GPU | Adreno 225 | PowerVR GE8320 | |
| External memory | microSD, up to 64 GB (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | |
| Internal memory | 8 GB, 1 GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 8 Total | 103760 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Single Core | 158 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 691 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 158 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 930 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Micro-SIM | Single SIM (Nano-SIM)Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE | |
| Bands | -2G - CDMA 800 / 1900 GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 -3G - CDMA2000 1xEV-DO HSDPA 2100 -4G - LTE band 13(700) |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM only) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE |
|
| Speed | EV-DO Rev.A 3.1 Mbps, LTE, HSPA | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | |
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) | |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 | |
| Bluetooth | 3.1, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE | |
| Harmful irradiation | SAR - 1.27 W/kg (head) 0.79 W/kg (body) |
SAR EU - 0.67 W/kg (head) 1.38 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
| Radio | No | FM radio, RDS, recording | |
| Headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
Other features
| Sensors | - Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | - Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer | |
| Other extras |
- Fast charging 15W |
||
| Versions |
- For Verizon Also known as Samsung SCH-I930 |
Reviews and Opinions on Samsung Ativ Odyssey I930 and Samsung Galaxy A12
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!