Samsung Galaxy A03 vs Infinix GT 10 Pro Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Samsung Galaxy A03
Smartphone 2
Infinix GT 10 Pro
Smartphone 3
Samsung Galaxy A03 or Infinix GT 10 Pro Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Samsung Galaxy A03 | Infinix GT 10 Pro | |
| Rating | (+) | (+) | |
| Release date | 2022, January | 2023, August 3 | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm | 6.46 x 6.46 x 2.99 in | 162.7 x 75.9 x 8.1 mm | 6.41 x 6.41 x 2.99 in | |
| Weight | 196 g | 6.91 oz | 187 g | 6.6 oz | |
| Body Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | ||
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Black, Blue, Red | Cyber Black, Mirage Silver | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | 5000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | |
| Approximate price | 100 EUR | 230 EUR | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | PLS TFT | AMOLED | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 1B | |
| Screen size | 6.5" in | 6.67" in | |
| Screen area | 102.0 cm2 | 107.4 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 20:9 (height:width) | 20:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 81.8% | 87.0% | |
| Screen resolution | 720 x 1600 px | 1080 x 2400 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 270 PPI | 395 PPI | |
| Other specs | - 120Hz, 900 nits (peak) - |
||
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 48 MP, Dual | 108 MP, Triple | |
| Camera specs | -48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF -2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
-108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", AF -2 MP, (macro) -2 MP, (depth) |
|
| Functions | LED flash | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | |
| Front camera, selfie | 5 MP, Single | 32 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | |
| Functions | Dual-LED flash | ||
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 11 | Android 13, XOS 13 | |
| Chipset | - Mediatek MT6893 Dimensity 8050 (6 nm) | ||
| CPU | - Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz & 6x1.6 GHz) | - Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | ||
| External memory | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | |
| Internal memory | 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 10 Total | 755575 | ||
| Antutu 10 CPU | 211873 | ||
| Antutu 10 GPU | 209570 | ||
| Antutu 10 Mem | 154870 | ||
| Antutu 10 UX | 211873 | ||
| Antutu 9 Total | 175450 | 811192 | |
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 956 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 3298 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Single SIM (Nano-SIM)Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 -4G - LTE |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 -5G - 1, 3, 5, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
|
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | |
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | |
| NFC | No | Yes | |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 | |
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | Yes | |
| Harmful irradiation |
SAR EU - 0.20 W/kg (head) 1.35 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
| Radio | FM radio | ||
| Headphone jack | Yes | Yes | |
| Others |
Other features
| Sensors | - Accelerometer, proximity | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro | |
| Other extras |
- 45W Fast charging, Power Delivery 3 - LED strip on the back |
Reviews and Opinions on Samsung Galaxy A03 and Infinix GT 10 Pro
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!
